TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermal environment in simulated offices with convective and radiant cooling systems under cooling (summer) mode of operation
AU - Mustakallio, Panu
AU - Bolashikov, Zhecho
AU - Kostov, Kalin
AU - Melikov, Arsen
AU - Kosonen, Risto
PY - 2016/5/1
Y1 - 2016/5/1
N2 - The thermal environment in a double office room and in a six-person meeting room obtained with chilled beam (CB), chilled beam with radiant panel (CBR), chilled ceiling with ceiling installed mixing ventilation (CCMV) and four desk partition-mounted local radiant cooling panels with mixing ventilation (MVRC) under summer (cooling) condition was compared. MVRC system was measured only for the office room case. CB provided convective cooling while the remaining three systems (CBR, CCMV and MVRC) provided combined radiant and convective cooling. Solar radiation, office equipment, lighting and occupants were simulated to obtain two different heat load conditions: 38 W/m2 and 64 W/m2 in the case of office room, and 71 W/m2 and 86 W/m2 in the case of meeting room. Air temperature, globe (operative) temperature, radiant asymmetry, air velocity and turbulent intensity were measured and draught rate calculated. Manikin-based equivalent temperature (MBET) was determined by using two thermal manikins to identify the impact of the local thermal conditions generated by the studied systems on occupants' thermal perception. The results revealed that the differences in the thermal conditions achieved with the four systems were not significant. CB and CBR provided slightly higher velocity level in the occupied zone. The operative temperature in the studied cases with chilled ceiling in operation with mixing ventilation was almost the same as the operative temperature obtained with the active chilled beam (i.e. only convective cooling). The heat load distribution played major role for the airflow pattern in all studied systems.
AB - The thermal environment in a double office room and in a six-person meeting room obtained with chilled beam (CB), chilled beam with radiant panel (CBR), chilled ceiling with ceiling installed mixing ventilation (CCMV) and four desk partition-mounted local radiant cooling panels with mixing ventilation (MVRC) under summer (cooling) condition was compared. MVRC system was measured only for the office room case. CB provided convective cooling while the remaining three systems (CBR, CCMV and MVRC) provided combined radiant and convective cooling. Solar radiation, office equipment, lighting and occupants were simulated to obtain two different heat load conditions: 38 W/m2 and 64 W/m2 in the case of office room, and 71 W/m2 and 86 W/m2 in the case of meeting room. Air temperature, globe (operative) temperature, radiant asymmetry, air velocity and turbulent intensity were measured and draught rate calculated. Manikin-based equivalent temperature (MBET) was determined by using two thermal manikins to identify the impact of the local thermal conditions generated by the studied systems on occupants' thermal perception. The results revealed that the differences in the thermal conditions achieved with the four systems were not significant. CB and CBR provided slightly higher velocity level in the occupied zone. The operative temperature in the studied cases with chilled ceiling in operation with mixing ventilation was almost the same as the operative temperature obtained with the active chilled beam (i.e. only convective cooling). The heat load distribution played major role for the airflow pattern in all studied systems.
KW - Chilled beam
KW - Chilled ceiling
KW - Convective cooling
KW - Mixing ventilation
KW - Office workplace
KW - Physical measurements
KW - Radiant cooling
KW - Thermal comfort
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958576715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.02.001
DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.02.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84958576715
VL - 100
SP - 82
EP - 91
JO - Building and Environment
JF - Building and Environment
SN - 0360-1323
ER -