Abstrakti
Emergency response refers to the systematic response to an unexpected, disruptive occurrence such as a natural disaster. The response aims to mitigate the consequences of the occurrence by providing the affected region with the necessary supplies. A critical factor for a successful response is its timely execution, but the unpredictable nature of disasters often prevents quick reactionary measures. Preallocating the supplies before the disaster takes place allows for a faster response, but requires more overall resources because the time and place of the disaster are not yet known. This gives rise to a trade-off between how quickly a response plan is executed and how precisely it targets the affected areas. Aiming to capture the dynamics of this trade-off, we develop a K-adjustable robust model, which allows a maximum of K second-stage decisions, i.e., response plans. This mitigates tractability issues and allows the decision-maker to seamlessly navigate the gap between the readiness of a proactive yet rigid response and the accuracy of a reactive yet highly adjustable one. The approaches we consider to solve the K-adaptable model are twofold: Via a branch-and-bound method as well as a static robust reformulation in combination with a column-and-constraint generation algorithm. In a computational study, we compare and contrast the different solution approaches and assess their potential.
Alkuperäiskieli | Englanti |
---|---|
Sivut | 925-940 |
Sivumäärä | 16 |
Julkaisu | European Journal of Operational Research |
Vuosikerta | 324 |
Numero | 3 |
Varhainen verkossa julkaisun päivämäärä | 2025 |
DOI - pysyväislinkit | |
Tila | Sähköinen julkaisu (e-pub) ennen painettua julkistusta - 2025 |
OKM-julkaisutyyppi | A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä |