Stakeholder Judgments of Value

Leena Lankoski, N. Craig Smith, Luk Van Wassenhove

Tutkimustuotos: LehtiartikkeliArticleScientificvertaisarvioitu

21 Sitaatiot (Scopus)

Abstrakti

Although central to stakeholder theory, stakeholder value is surprisingly neglected in the literature. We draw upon prospect theory to show how stakeholder judgments of value depend crucially on the reference state, how there are several alternative reference states that may be operative when stakeholders judge value, how the choice of reference state for stakeholders' value judgments can occur intuitively or deliberately, and how the level of the operant reference state may change with time and may also be incorrectly perceived by stakeholders or managers. Our theorizing results in a fundamentally different way of perceiving the value of corporate actions to stakeholders and shifts understanding of the avenues available for companies and others to influence stakeholder judgments of value. This novel perspective has implications both for theory and management practice, and not least for normative business ethics, if business is about stakeholder value creation.

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
Sivut227-256
Sivumäärä30
JulkaisuBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Vuosikerta26
Numero2
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 1 huhtikuuta 2016
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Julkaistu artikkeli, soviteltu

Sormenjälki Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Stakeholder Judgments of Value'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä