TY - JOUR
T1 - Spectral decomposition of thermal conductivity
T2 - Comparing velocity decomposition methods in homogeneous molecular dynamics simulations
AU - Gabourie, Alexander J.
AU - Fan, Zheyong
AU - Ala-Nissila, Tapio
AU - Pop, Eric
N1 - Funding Information:
Some of the computing for this project was performed on the Sherlock cluster at Stanford University. We would like to thank Stanford University and the Stanford Research Computing Center (SRCC) for providing computational resources and support that contributed to these results. This paper was also partially supported by ASCENT, one of the six centers in JUMP, a Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) program sponsored by DARPA. A.J.G. also acknowledges support from the Achievement Rewards for College Scientists (ARCS) Northern California Chapter. T.A-N. has been supported in part by the Academy of Finland through its QTF Center of Excellence (Project No. 312298). Z.F. has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; No. 11974059).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Physical Society.
PY - 2021/5/17
Y1 - 2021/5/17
N2 - The design of applications, especially those based on heterogeneous integration, must rely on detailed knowledge of material properties, such as thermal conductivity (TC). To this end, multiple methods have been developed to study TC as a function of vibrational frequency. Here, we compare three spectral TC methods based on velocity decomposition in homogenous molecular dynamics simulations: Green-Kubo modal analysis (GKMA), the spectral heat current (SHC) method, and a method we propose called homogeneous nonequilibrium modal analysis (HNEMA). First, we derive a convenient per-atom virial expression for systems described by general many-body potentials, enabling compact representations of the heat current, each velocity decomposition method, and other related quantities. Next, we evaluate each method by calculating the spectral TC for carbon nanotubes, graphene, and silicon. We show that each method qualitatively agrees except at optical phonon frequencies, where a combination of mismatched eigenvectors and a large density of states produces artificial TC peaks for modal analysis (MA) methods. Our calculations also show that the HNEMA and SHC methods converge much faster than the GKMA method, with the SHC method being the most computationally efficient. Finally, we demonstrate that our MA implementation in the Graphics Processing Units Molecular Dynamics code on a single graphics processing unit is over 1000 times faster than the existing implementation in the Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator code on one central processing unit.
AB - The design of applications, especially those based on heterogeneous integration, must rely on detailed knowledge of material properties, such as thermal conductivity (TC). To this end, multiple methods have been developed to study TC as a function of vibrational frequency. Here, we compare three spectral TC methods based on velocity decomposition in homogenous molecular dynamics simulations: Green-Kubo modal analysis (GKMA), the spectral heat current (SHC) method, and a method we propose called homogeneous nonequilibrium modal analysis (HNEMA). First, we derive a convenient per-atom virial expression for systems described by general many-body potentials, enabling compact representations of the heat current, each velocity decomposition method, and other related quantities. Next, we evaluate each method by calculating the spectral TC for carbon nanotubes, graphene, and silicon. We show that each method qualitatively agrees except at optical phonon frequencies, where a combination of mismatched eigenvectors and a large density of states produces artificial TC peaks for modal analysis (MA) methods. Our calculations also show that the HNEMA and SHC methods converge much faster than the GKMA method, with the SHC method being the most computationally efficient. Finally, we demonstrate that our MA implementation in the Graphics Processing Units Molecular Dynamics code on a single graphics processing unit is over 1000 times faster than the existing implementation in the Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator code on one central processing unit.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107071496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.205421
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.205421
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107071496
VL - 103
JO - Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics)
JF - Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics)
SN - 2469-9950
IS - 20
M1 - 205421
ER -