Round robin into best practices for the determination of indentation size effects

Tutkimustuotos: Lehtiartikkelivertaisarvioitu


  • Ana Ruiz-moreno
  • Peter Hähner
  • Lukasz Kurpaska
  • Jacek Jagielski
  • Philippe Spätig
  • Michal Trebala
  • Simo Pekka Hannula
  • Susana Merino
  • Gonzalo de Diego
  • Hygreeva Namburi
  • Ondrej Libera
  • Dimitry Terentyev
  • Tymofii Khvan
  • Cornelia Heintze
  • Nigel Jennett


  • European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute
  • NCBJ National Centre for Nuclear Research
  • Paul Scherrer Institute
  • Centrum Vyzkumu Rez
  • Belgian Nuclear Research Center
  • Institute of Resource Ecology
  • Coventry University


The paper presents a statistical study of nanoindentation results obtained in seven European laboratories which have joined a round robin exercise to assess methods for the evaluation of indentation size effects. The study focuses on the characterization of ferritic/martensitic steels T91 and Eurofer97, envisaged as structural materials for nuclear fission and fusion applications, respectively. Depth-controlled single cycle measurements at various final indentation depths, force-controlled single cycle and force-controlled progressive multi-cycle measurements using Berkovich indenters at room temperature have been combined to calculate the indentation hardness and the elastic modulus as a function of depth applying the Oliver and Pharr method. Intra- and inter-laboratory variabilities have been evaluated. Elastic modulus corrections have been applied to the hardness data to compensate for materials related systematic errors, like pile-up behaviour, which is not accounted for by the Oliver and Pharr theory, and other sources of instrumental or methodological bias. The correction modifies the statistical hardness profiles and allows determining more reliable indentation size effects.


TilaJulkaistu - 1 tammikuuta 2020
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Julkaistu artikkeli, soviteltu

Lataa tilasto

Ei tietoja saatavilla

ID: 40830210