TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of risk assessment for navigational safety and supported decisions in arctic waters
AU - Yang, X
AU - Lin, ZY
AU - Zhang, W. J.
AU - Xu, Sheng
AU - Zhang, MY
AU - Wu, Z. D.
AU - Han, B
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - The study of Arctic navigation safety is becoming increasingly important due to the rise in commercial and strategic significance of Arctic shipping routes. To explore the state of risk assessment methodologies in the context of Arctic navigation safety, this paper conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 149 articles, along with an in-depth review of 22 articles. The analysis reveals that despite a surge in research focus since 2015, particularly regarding collision risks involving ship-to-ship and ship-to-ice encounters in the Northeast passage, substantial gaps exist in applying these models in practice. The study highlights that equipment failures are largely neglected in academic discussions, and the Northwest Passage is under-researched despite its operational challenges, such as difficulties in predicting ice conditions due to wind and currents from the North American continent, smaller navigation windows, and so forth. The most applied risk assessment models are identified for various decision-making contexts, acknowledging their methodological limitations. The paper concludes with a call for decision-oriented modelling techniques and the bridging of academic research with practical application. It recommends incorporation of overlooked risk factors, such as equipment failures, human error, and region-specific navigational challenges, to develop more robust and applicable risk assessment models for various decision scenarios.
AB - The study of Arctic navigation safety is becoming increasingly important due to the rise in commercial and strategic significance of Arctic shipping routes. To explore the state of risk assessment methodologies in the context of Arctic navigation safety, this paper conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 149 articles, along with an in-depth review of 22 articles. The analysis reveals that despite a surge in research focus since 2015, particularly regarding collision risks involving ship-to-ship and ship-to-ice encounters in the Northeast passage, substantial gaps exist in applying these models in practice. The study highlights that equipment failures are largely neglected in academic discussions, and the Northwest Passage is under-researched despite its operational challenges, such as difficulties in predicting ice conditions due to wind and currents from the North American continent, smaller navigation windows, and so forth. The most applied risk assessment models are identified for various decision-making contexts, acknowledging their methodological limitations. The paper concludes with a call for decision-oriented modelling techniques and the bridging of academic research with practical application. It recommends incorporation of overlooked risk factors, such as equipment failures, human error, and region-specific navigational challenges, to develop more robust and applicable risk assessment models for various decision scenarios.
KW - Arctic navigation safety
KW - Decision -oriented risk assessment
KW - Risk analysis
KW - Risk assessment
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=aalto_pure&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001124383200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183576819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106931
DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106931
M3 - Review Article
SN - 0964-5691
VL - 247
JO - OCEAN AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT
JF - OCEAN AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT
M1 - 106931
ER -