Primacy of emotional vs. semantic scene recognition in peripheral vision

Manuel G. Calvo, Pedro Avero, Lauri Nummenmaa

Tutkimustuotos: LehtiartikkeliArticleScientificvertaisarvioitu

4 Sitaatiot (Scopus)

Abstrakti

Emotional scenes were presented peripherally (5.2° away from fixation) or foveally (at fixation) for 150 ms. In affective evaluation tasks viewers judged whether a scene was unpleasant or not, or whether it was pleasant or not. In semantic categorisation tasks viewers judged whether a scene involved animals or humans (superordinate-level task), or whether it portrayed females or males (subordinate-level task). The same stimuli were used for the affective and the semantic task. Results indicated that in peripheral vision affective evaluation was less accurate and slower than animal/ human discrimination, and did not show any advantage over gender discrimination. In addition, performance impairment in the peripheral relative to the foveal condition was greater or equivalent for affective than for semantic categorisation. These findings cast doubts on the specialness and the primacy of affective over semantic recognition. The findings are also relevant when considering the role of the subcortical "low route" in emotional processing.

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
Sivut1358-1375
Sivumäärä18
JulkaisuCOGNITION AND EMOTION
Vuosikerta25
Numero8
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2011
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Julkaistu artikkeli, soviteltu

Sormenjälki Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Primacy of emotional vs. semantic scene recognition in peripheral vision'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

  • Siteeraa tätä