Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

Christer Bengs

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

Christer Bengs^*

^*Tämän työn vastaava kirjoittaja

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/konferenssijulkaisussa › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › vertaisarvioitu

274 Lataukset (Pure)

Abstrakti

International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Alkuperäiskieli	Englanti
Otsikko	2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020)
Toimittajat	F Calabro, L DellaSpina
Kustantaja	Elsevier
Sivut	561-567
Sivumäärä	7
DOI - pysyväislinkit	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344
Tila	Julkaistu - 2016
OKM-julkaisutyyppi	A4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa
Tapahtuma	International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives - Reggio Calabria, Italia Kesto: 18 toukok. 2016 → 20 toukok. 2016 Konferenssinumero: 2

Julkaisusarja

Nimi	Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences
Kustantaja	ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Vuosikerta	223
ISSN (painettu)	1877-0428

Conference

Conference	International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives
Lyhennettä	ISTH2020
Maa/Alue	Italia
Kaupunki	Reggio Calabria
Ajanjakso	18/05/2016 → 20/05/2016

Pääsy asiakirjaan

10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

1-s2.0-S1877042816304244-main
2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Final published version, 211 KBLisenssi: CC BY-NC-ND

Siteeraa tätä

Bengs, C. (2016). Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. teoksessa F. Calabro, & L. DellaSpina (Toimittajat), 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020) (Sivut 561-567). (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vuosikerta 223). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

Bengs, Christer. / Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020). Toimittaja / F Calabro ; L DellaSpina. Elsevier, 2016. Sivut 561-567 (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences).

@inproceedings{603bdb1edd59484d883440b9d9c59772,

title = "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate",

abstract = "International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.",

keywords = "Heritage, evaluation, expertise, NATIONAL CULTURE",

author = "Christer Bengs",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344",

language = "English",

series = "Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences",

publisher = "Elsevier",

pages = "561--567",

editor = "F Calabro and L DellaSpina",

booktitle = "2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020)",

address = "Netherlands",

note = "International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives, ISTH2020 ; Conference date: 18-05-2016 Through 20-05-2016",

}

Bengs, C 2016, Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. julkaisussa F Calabro & L DellaSpina (toim), 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vuosikerta 223, Elsevier, Sivut 561-567, International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives, Reggio Calabria, Italia, 18/05/2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. / Bengs, Christer.
2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020). toim. / F Calabro; L DellaSpina. Elsevier, 2016. s. 561-567 (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vuosikerta 223).

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/konferenssijulkaisussa › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › vertaisarvioitu

TY - GEN

T1 - Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

AU - Bengs, Christer

N1 - Conference code: 2

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

AB - International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

KW - Heritage

KW - evaluation

KW - expertise

KW - NATIONAL CULTURE

U2 - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

DO - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

T3 - Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences

SP - 561

EP - 567

BT - 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020)

A2 - Calabro, F

A2 - DellaSpina, L

PB - Elsevier

T2 - International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives

Y2 - 18 May 2016 through 20 May 2016

ER -

Bengs C. Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. julkaisussa Calabro F, DellaSpina L, toimittajat, 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020). Elsevier. 2016. s. 561-567. (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences). doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

Abstrakti

Julkaisusarja

Conference

Pääsy asiakirjaan

Sormenjälki

Siteeraa tätä