TY - JOUR
T1 - Performances of machine learning algorithms for individual thermal comfort prediction based on data from professional and practical settings
AU - Yu, Changyong
AU - Li, Baizhan
AU - Wu, Yuxin
AU - Chen, Baofan
AU - Kosonen, Risto
AU - Kilpeläinen, Simo
AU - Liu, Hong
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was financially supported by the High-End Foreign Experts Project (Grant No. G2021165006L ) and 111 Project (Grant No. B13041 ) of China. The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to Zelong Tian and Zixuan Zhang for their assistance in investigation and data curation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - Individual thermal comfort prediction models based on real-time monitoring parameters could improve the efficiency of personal air conditioning systems. However, there is a contradiction between accuracy and cost/convenience to acquire input data for individual thermal comfort prediction models. In previous studies, the performance of these models was examined using input data from either professional or low-cost devices, but they have not been compared with each other. In this study, 32 subjects with different individual features participated in climate chamber experiments with air temperatures ramp between 18 and 34 °C in summer. Commonly-used machine learning (ML) algorithms, e.g. Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Discriminant Analysis and ensemble methods, were used to examine two kinds of input data: the professional setting with 10 predictors include multiple personal features and high accuracy skin temperatures (±0.15 °C), and the practical setting with 5 easier obtained predictors include infrared skin temperatures (±1 °C). Results showed the overall accuracies of ML algorithms were generally higher by 0.4%–12.3% using the data in professional setting than that in practical setting. Comprehensive consideration, the optimized Cosine KNN (an accuracy of 83.6%, a precision of 89.7%, a recall of 84.3% and AUC = 0.86) and ensemble of Subspace KNN (an accuracy of 75.4%, a precision of 79.6%, a recall of 82.7%, and AUC = 0.87) were the best ML algorithms for professional and practical settings, respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed the skin temperatures were important predictors, while the age was a more important feature in practical setting then professional setting. This study could provide useful information for the selection of features and machine learning algorithms for individual thermal comfort prediction in actual buildings.
AB - Individual thermal comfort prediction models based on real-time monitoring parameters could improve the efficiency of personal air conditioning systems. However, there is a contradiction between accuracy and cost/convenience to acquire input data for individual thermal comfort prediction models. In previous studies, the performance of these models was examined using input data from either professional or low-cost devices, but they have not been compared with each other. In this study, 32 subjects with different individual features participated in climate chamber experiments with air temperatures ramp between 18 and 34 °C in summer. Commonly-used machine learning (ML) algorithms, e.g. Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Discriminant Analysis and ensemble methods, were used to examine two kinds of input data: the professional setting with 10 predictors include multiple personal features and high accuracy skin temperatures (±0.15 °C), and the practical setting with 5 easier obtained predictors include infrared skin temperatures (±1 °C). Results showed the overall accuracies of ML algorithms were generally higher by 0.4%–12.3% using the data in professional setting than that in practical setting. Comprehensive consideration, the optimized Cosine KNN (an accuracy of 83.6%, a precision of 89.7%, a recall of 84.3% and AUC = 0.86) and ensemble of Subspace KNN (an accuracy of 75.4%, a precision of 79.6%, a recall of 82.7%, and AUC = 0.87) were the best ML algorithms for professional and practical settings, respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed the skin temperatures were important predictors, while the age was a more important feature in practical setting then professional setting. This study could provide useful information for the selection of features and machine learning algorithms for individual thermal comfort prediction in actual buildings.
KW - Age
KW - Machine learning
KW - Skin temperature
KW - Thermal comfort
KW - Thermal sensation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138781884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105278
DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105278
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138781884
SN - 2352-7102
VL - 61
JO - Journal of Building Engineering
JF - Journal of Building Engineering
M1 - 105278
ER -