TY - JOUR
T1 - Neural basis of in-group bias and prejudices
T2 - A systematic meta-analysis
AU - Saarinen, Aino
AU - Jääskeläinen, Iiro P.
AU - Harjunen, Ville
AU - Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa
AU - Jasinskaja-Lahti, Inga
AU - Ravaja, Niklas
N1 - Funding Information:
We are deeply grateful for the authors of original publications who kindly provided additional information for conducting this meta-analysis: Manuela Berlingeri, University of Urbino, Italy; Brittany Cassidy, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, US; Mina Cikara and Tatiana Lau, Harvard University, US; Melike Fourie, Stellenbosch University, South Africa; Grit Hein, University of Würzburg, Germany; Keise Izuma, University of Southampton, UK; Matt T. Richins, University of Exeter, UK; Mona Sobhani, University of Southern California, US. Financially supported by the Academy of Finland #332309 (to the Prevent Consortium) and by the International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology ICN HSE RF Government grant ag. No. 075-15-2019-1930 (to Iiro P. Jääskeläinen).
Funding Information:
We are deeply grateful for the authors of original publications who kindly provided additional information for conducting this meta-analysis: Manuela Berlingeri, University of Urbino, Italy; Brittany Cassidy, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, US; Mina Cikara and Tatiana Lau, Harvard University, US; Melike Fourie, Stellenbosch University, South Africa; Grit Hein, University of W?rzburg, Germany; Keise Izuma, University of Southampton, UK; Matt T. Richins, University of Exeter, UK; Mona Sobhani, University of Southern California, US. Financially supported by the Academy of Finland#332309 (to the Prevent Consortium) and by the International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology ICN HSE RF Government grant ag. No. 075-15-2019-1930 (to Iiro P. J??skel?inen).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - In-group favoritism and prejudices relate to discriminatory behaviors but, despite decades of research, understanding of their neural correlates has been limited. A systematic coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies (altogether 87 original datasets, n = 2328) was conducted to investigate neural inter-group biases, i.e., responses toward in-group vs. out-group in different contexts. We found inter-group biases in some previously identified brain regions (e.g., the medial prefrontal cortex, insula) but also in many previously non-identified brain regions (e.g., the cerebellum, precentral gyrus). Sub-group analyses indicated that neural correlates of inter-group biases may be mostly context-specific. Regarding different types of group memberships, inter-group bias toward trivial groups was evident only in the cingulate cortex, while inter-group biases toward “real” groups (ethnic, national, or political groups) involved broader sets of brain regions. Additionally, there were heightened neural threat responses toward out-groups’ faces and stronger neural empathic responses toward in-groups’ suffering. We did not obtain significant publication bias. Overall, the findings provide novel implications for theory and prejudice-reduction interventions.
AB - In-group favoritism and prejudices relate to discriminatory behaviors but, despite decades of research, understanding of their neural correlates has been limited. A systematic coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies (altogether 87 original datasets, n = 2328) was conducted to investigate neural inter-group biases, i.e., responses toward in-group vs. out-group in different contexts. We found inter-group biases in some previously identified brain regions (e.g., the medial prefrontal cortex, insula) but also in many previously non-identified brain regions (e.g., the cerebellum, precentral gyrus). Sub-group analyses indicated that neural correlates of inter-group biases may be mostly context-specific. Regarding different types of group memberships, inter-group bias toward trivial groups was evident only in the cingulate cortex, while inter-group biases toward “real” groups (ethnic, national, or political groups) involved broader sets of brain regions. Additionally, there were heightened neural threat responses toward out-groups’ faces and stronger neural empathic responses toward in-groups’ suffering. We did not obtain significant publication bias. Overall, the findings provide novel implications for theory and prejudice-reduction interventions.
KW - BOLD
KW - Brain
KW - Discrimination
KW - In-group favoritism
KW - Out-group derogation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118505009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.027
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.027
M3 - Review Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118505009
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 131
SP - 1214
EP - 1227
JO - NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
JF - NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
ER -