Lessons learned from rapid environmental risk assessments for prioritization of alien species using expert panels

L. N. H. Verbrugge; L. de Hoop; R. Aukema; R. Beringen; R. C. M. Creemers; G. A. van Duinen; H. Hollander; E. de Hullu; M. Scherpenissee; F. Spikmans; C. A. M. van Turnhout; S. Wijnhoven; R. S. E. W. Leuven

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109405

Lessons learned from rapid environmental risk assessments for prioritization of alien species using expert panels

L. N. H. Verbrugge^*
, L. de Hoop
, R. Aukema
, R. Beringen
, R. C. M. Creemers
, G. A. van Duinen
, H. Hollander
, E. de Hullu
, M. Scherpenissee
, F. Spikmans
, C. A. M. van Turnhout
, S. Wijnhoven
, R. S. E. W. Leuven

^*Tämän työn vastaava kirjoittaja

Ei julkaistu Aalto-yliopiston affiliaatiolla

Tutkimustuotos: Lehtiartikkeli › Article › Scientific › vertaisarvioitu

18 Viittaukset (Web of Science)

Abstrakti

Limiting the spread and impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) on biodiversity and ecosystems has become a goal of global, regional and national biodiversity policies. Evidence based management of IAS requires support by risk assessments, which are often based on expert judgment. We developed a tool to prioritize potentially new IAS based on their ecological risks, socio-economic impact and feasibility of management using multidisciplinary expert panels. Nine expert panels reviewed scientific studies, grey literature and expert knowledge for 152 species. The quality assessment of available knowledge revealed a lack of peer-reviewed data and high dependency on best professional judgments, especially for impacts on ecosystem services and feasibility of management. Expert consultation is crucial for conducting and validating rapid assessments of alien species. There is still a lack of attention for systematic and methodologically sound assessment of impacts on ecosystem services and weighting negative and positive effects of alien species.

Alkuperäiskieli	Englanti
Artikkeli	109405
Sivumäärä	10
Julkaisu	Journal of Environmental Management
Vuosikerta	249
DOI - pysyväislinkit	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109405
Tila	Julkaistu - 1 marrask. 2019
OKM-julkaisutyyppi	A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Rahoitus

This study was financially supported by the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA), grant number 60003480. We thank Ir. W.J. Lammers (NVWA) for constructive comments and pleasant collaboration, A. Spitzen and R. van Leeningen (both RAVON) for their contribution to rapid assessments of amphibians and reptiles, and Ben Crombaghs, Jasja Dekker, Jeroen van Delft, Vilmar Dijkstra, Martijn Dorenbosch, Marco Faasse, Arjan Gittenberger, Riette Iken, Patrick Jansen, Hugh Jansman, Henk van der Jeugd, Saa Henry Kabuta, Nils van Kessel, Roy Kleukers, Andre van Kleunen, Marc Lavaleye, Rob Lensink, Jaap van der Linden, Dolf Moerkens, Godfried van Moorsel, Jinze Noordijk, Baudewijn Ode, Fabrice Ottburg, Roelf Pot, Meta Rijks, Jeffrey Samuels, Martijn Schiphouwer, Henk Siebel, Hans Sessink, Bram bij de Vaate en Johan van Valkenburg for reviewing rapid assessments of alien species and contributing to workshops for validation of risk classifications and management options. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their critical remarks and suggestions to improve our paper.

YK:n kestävän kehityksen tavoitteet

Tämä tuotos edistää seuraavia kestävän kehityksen tavoitteita:

SDG 13 – Ilmastotoimet

Pääsy asiakirjaan

10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109405Lisenssi: CC BY

Siteeraa tätä

Verbrugge, L. N. H., de Hoop, L., Aukema, R., Beringen, R., Creemers, R. C. M., van Duinen, G. A., Hollander, H., de Hullu, E., Scherpenissee, M., Spikmans, F., van Turnhout, C. A. M., Wijnhoven, S., & Leuven, R. S. E. W. (2019). Lessons learned from rapid environmental risk assessments for prioritization of alien species using expert panels. Journal of Environmental Management, 249, Artikkeli 109405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109405

@article{ef6807be430c481b97f7fa102370dd30,

title = "Lessons learned from rapid environmental risk assessments for prioritization of alien species using expert panels",

abstract = "Limiting the spread and impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) on biodiversity and ecosystems has become a goal of global, regional and national biodiversity policies. Evidence based management of IAS requires support by risk assessments, which are often based on expert judgment. We developed a tool to prioritize potentially new IAS based on their ecological risks, socio-economic impact and feasibility of management using multidisciplinary expert panels. Nine expert panels reviewed scientific studies, grey literature and expert knowledge for 152 species. The quality assessment of available knowledge revealed a lack of peer-reviewed data and high dependency on best professional judgments, especially for impacts on ecosystem services and feasibility of management. Expert consultation is crucial for conducting and validating rapid assessments of alien species. There is still a lack of attention for systematic and methodologically sound assessment of impacts on ecosystem services and weighting negative and positive effects of alien species.",

keywords = "Ecosystem services, Ecological impact, Expert knowledge, Management feasibility, Non-native species, Socio-economic impact, FRESH-WATER FISHES, BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, KNOWLEDGE, FRAMEWORK, MANAGEMENT, SUPPORT, CLIMATE, TURKEY, LIST",

author = "Verbrugge, \{L. N. H.\} and \{de Hoop\}, L. and R. Aukema and R. Beringen and Creemers, \{R. C. M.\} and \{van Duinen\}, \{G. A.\} and H. Hollander and \{de Hullu\}, E. and M. Scherpenissee and F. Spikmans and \{van Turnhout\}, \{C. A. M.\} and S. Wijnhoven and Leuven, \{R. S. E. W.\}",

year = "2019",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109405",

language = "English",

volume = "249",

journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",

issn = "0301-4797",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Verbrugge, LNH, de Hoop, L, Aukema, R, Beringen, R, Creemers, RCM, van Duinen, GA, Hollander, H, de Hullu, E, Scherpenissee, M, Spikmans, F, van Turnhout, CAM, Wijnhoven, S & Leuven, RSEW 2019, 'Lessons learned from rapid environmental risk assessments for prioritization of alien species using expert panels', Journal of Environmental Management, Vuosikerta 249, 109405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109405

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lessons learned from rapid environmental risk assessments for prioritization of alien species using expert panels

AU - Verbrugge, L. N. H.

AU - de Hoop, L.

AU - Aukema, R.

AU - Beringen, R.

AU - Creemers, R. C. M.

AU - van Duinen, G. A.

AU - Hollander, H.

AU - de Hullu, E.

AU - Scherpenissee, M.

AU - Spikmans, F.

AU - van Turnhout, C. A. M.

AU - Wijnhoven, S.

AU - Leuven, R. S. E. W.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Limiting the spread and impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) on biodiversity and ecosystems has become a goal of global, regional and national biodiversity policies. Evidence based management of IAS requires support by risk assessments, which are often based on expert judgment. We developed a tool to prioritize potentially new IAS based on their ecological risks, socio-economic impact and feasibility of management using multidisciplinary expert panels. Nine expert panels reviewed scientific studies, grey literature and expert knowledge for 152 species. The quality assessment of available knowledge revealed a lack of peer-reviewed data and high dependency on best professional judgments, especially for impacts on ecosystem services and feasibility of management. Expert consultation is crucial for conducting and validating rapid assessments of alien species. There is still a lack of attention for systematic and methodologically sound assessment of impacts on ecosystem services and weighting negative and positive effects of alien species.

AB - Limiting the spread and impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) on biodiversity and ecosystems has become a goal of global, regional and national biodiversity policies. Evidence based management of IAS requires support by risk assessments, which are often based on expert judgment. We developed a tool to prioritize potentially new IAS based on their ecological risks, socio-economic impact and feasibility of management using multidisciplinary expert panels. Nine expert panels reviewed scientific studies, grey literature and expert knowledge for 152 species. The quality assessment of available knowledge revealed a lack of peer-reviewed data and high dependency on best professional judgments, especially for impacts on ecosystem services and feasibility of management. Expert consultation is crucial for conducting and validating rapid assessments of alien species. There is still a lack of attention for systematic and methodologically sound assessment of impacts on ecosystem services and weighting negative and positive effects of alien species.

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Ecological impact

KW - Expert knowledge

KW - Management feasibility

KW - Non-native species

KW - Socio-economic impact

KW - FRESH-WATER FISHES

KW - BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS

KW - KNOWLEDGE

KW - FRAMEWORK

KW - MANAGEMENT

KW - SUPPORT

KW - CLIMATE

KW - TURKEY

KW - LIST

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109405

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109405

M3 - Article

SN - 0301-4797

VL - 249

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

M1 - 109405

ER -

Lessons learned from rapid environmental risk assessments for prioritization of alien species using expert panels

Abstrakti

Rahoitus

YK:n kestävän kehityksen tavoitteet

Pääsy asiakirjaan

Sormenjälki

Siteeraa tätä