How can we make sound replication decisions?

Clintin P. Davis-Stober*, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Balazs Aczel, Suyog H. Chandramouli, Timothy M. Errington, Sarahanne M. Field, Ayelet Fishbach, Juliana Freire, John P.A. Ioannidis, Klaus Oberauer, Franco Pestilli, Susanne Ressl, Daniel J. Schad, Judith ter Schure, Katya Tentori, Don van Ravenzwaaij, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Odd Erik Gundersen

*Tämän työn vastaava kirjoittaja

Tutkimustuotos: LehtiartikkeliArticleScientificvertaisarvioitu

1 Sitaatiot (Scopus)
5 Lataukset (Pure)

Abstrakti

Replication and the reported crises impacting many fields of research have become a focal point for the sciences. This has led to reforms in publishing, methodological design and reporting, and increased numbers of experimental replications coordinated across many laboratories. While replication is rightly considered an indispensable tool of science, financial resources and researchers' time are quite limited. In this perspective, we examine different values and attitudes that scientists can consider when deciding whether to replicate a finding and how. We offer a conceptual framework for assessing the usefulness of various replication tools, such as preregistration.

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
Artikkelie2401236121
Sivumäärä10
JulkaisuProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vuosikerta122
Numero5
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2025
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'How can we make sound replication decisions?'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä