Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research

Tutkimustuotos: Lehtiartikkelivertaisarvioitu

Standard

Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. / Gross, Joachim; Baillet, Sylvain; Barnes, Gareth R.; Henson, Richard N.; Hillebrand, Arjan; Jensen, Ole; Jerbi, Karim; Litvak, Vladimir; Maess, Burkhard; Oostenveld, Robert; Parkkonen, Lauri; Taylor, Jason R.; Wassenhovek, Virginie van; Wibraln, Michael; Schoffelen, Jan-Mathjis.

julkaisussa: NeuroImage, Vuosikerta 65, 2013, s. 349-363.

Tutkimustuotos: Lehtiartikkelivertaisarvioitu

Harvard

Gross, J, Baillet, S, Barnes, GR, Henson, RN, Hillebrand, A, Jensen, O, Jerbi, K, Litvak, V, Maess, B, Oostenveld, R, Parkkonen, L, Taylor, JR, Wassenhovek, VV, Wibraln, M & Schoffelen, J-M 2013, 'Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research' NeuroImage, Vuosikerta. 65, Sivut 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001

APA

Gross, J., Baillet, S., Barnes, G. R., Henson, R. N., Hillebrand, A., Jensen, O., ... Schoffelen, J-M. (2013). Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. NeuroImage, 65, 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001

Vancouver

Gross J, Baillet S, Barnes GR, Henson RN, Hillebrand A, Jensen O et al. Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. NeuroImage. 2013;65:349-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001

Author

Gross, Joachim ; Baillet, Sylvain ; Barnes, Gareth R. ; Henson, Richard N. ; Hillebrand, Arjan ; Jensen, Ole ; Jerbi, Karim ; Litvak, Vladimir ; Maess, Burkhard ; Oostenveld, Robert ; Parkkonen, Lauri ; Taylor, Jason R. ; Wassenhovek, Virginie van ; Wibraln, Michael ; Schoffelen, Jan-Mathjis. / Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Julkaisussa: NeuroImage. 2013 ; Vuosikerta 65. Sivut 349-363.

Bibtex - Lataa

@article{9599621a5a434af79bdfb50e7d9bb843,
title = "Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research",
abstract = "Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings are a rich source of information about the neural dynamics underlying cognitive processes in the brain, with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution. In recent years there have been considerable advances in MEG hardware developments and methods. Sophisticated analysis techniques are now routinely applied and continuously improved, leading to fascinating insights into the intricate dynamics of neural processes. However, the rapidly increasing level of complexity of the different steps in a MEG study make it difficult for novices, and sometimes even for experts, to stay aware of possible limitations and caveats. Furthermore, the complexity of MEG data acquisition and data analysis requires special attention when describing MEG studies in publications, in order to facilitate interpretation and reproduction of the results. This manuscript aims at making recommendations for a number of important data acquisition and data analysis steps and suggests details that should be specified in manuscripts reporting MEG studies. These recommendations will hopefully serve as guidelines that help to strengthen the position of the MEG research community within the field of neuroscience, and may foster discussion in order to further enhance the quality and impact of MEG research.",
keywords = "Magnetoencephalography, MEG, Acquisition, Analysis, Connectivity, Source localization, Guidelines, Recommendations, Reproducible research, Spectral analysis",
author = "Joachim Gross and Sylvain Baillet and Barnes, {Gareth R.} and Henson, {Richard N.} and Arjan Hillebrand and Ole Jensen and Karim Jerbi and Vladimir Litvak and Burkhard Maess and Robert Oostenveld and Lauri Parkkonen and Taylor, {Jason R.} and Wassenhovek, {Virginie van} and Michael Wibraln and Jan-Mathjis Schoffelen",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "349--363",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",

}

RIS - Lataa

TY - JOUR

T1 - Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research

AU - Gross, Joachim

AU - Baillet, Sylvain

AU - Barnes, Gareth R.

AU - Henson, Richard N.

AU - Hillebrand, Arjan

AU - Jensen, Ole

AU - Jerbi, Karim

AU - Litvak, Vladimir

AU - Maess, Burkhard

AU - Oostenveld, Robert

AU - Parkkonen, Lauri

AU - Taylor, Jason R.

AU - Wassenhovek, Virginie van

AU - Wibraln, Michael

AU - Schoffelen, Jan-Mathjis

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings are a rich source of information about the neural dynamics underlying cognitive processes in the brain, with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution. In recent years there have been considerable advances in MEG hardware developments and methods. Sophisticated analysis techniques are now routinely applied and continuously improved, leading to fascinating insights into the intricate dynamics of neural processes. However, the rapidly increasing level of complexity of the different steps in a MEG study make it difficult for novices, and sometimes even for experts, to stay aware of possible limitations and caveats. Furthermore, the complexity of MEG data acquisition and data analysis requires special attention when describing MEG studies in publications, in order to facilitate interpretation and reproduction of the results. This manuscript aims at making recommendations for a number of important data acquisition and data analysis steps and suggests details that should be specified in manuscripts reporting MEG studies. These recommendations will hopefully serve as guidelines that help to strengthen the position of the MEG research community within the field of neuroscience, and may foster discussion in order to further enhance the quality and impact of MEG research.

AB - Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings are a rich source of information about the neural dynamics underlying cognitive processes in the brain, with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution. In recent years there have been considerable advances in MEG hardware developments and methods. Sophisticated analysis techniques are now routinely applied and continuously improved, leading to fascinating insights into the intricate dynamics of neural processes. However, the rapidly increasing level of complexity of the different steps in a MEG study make it difficult for novices, and sometimes even for experts, to stay aware of possible limitations and caveats. Furthermore, the complexity of MEG data acquisition and data analysis requires special attention when describing MEG studies in publications, in order to facilitate interpretation and reproduction of the results. This manuscript aims at making recommendations for a number of important data acquisition and data analysis steps and suggests details that should be specified in manuscripts reporting MEG studies. These recommendations will hopefully serve as guidelines that help to strengthen the position of the MEG research community within the field of neuroscience, and may foster discussion in order to further enhance the quality and impact of MEG research.

KW - Magnetoencephalography

KW - MEG

KW - Acquisition

KW - Analysis

KW - Connectivity

KW - Source localization

KW - Guidelines

KW - Recommendations

KW - Reproducible research

KW - Spectral analysis

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 349

EP - 363

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

ER -

ID: 933893