Explaining Mandate Loss of Regional Headquarters: The Difference between Full and Partial Loss

Perttu Kähäri*, Iiris Saittakari, Rebecca Piekkari, Wilhelm Barner-Rasmussen

*Tämän työn vastaava kirjoittaja

Tutkimustuotos: LehtiartikkeliArticleScientificvertaisarvioitu

13 Sitaatiot (Scopus)

Abstrakti

The fluidity of regional headquarters (RHQ) mandates is a core aspect of disaggregating HQ activities in MNCs. While ‘slicing’ of global value chains has received attention in previous research, the parallel disaggregation of management activities has not. Our longitudinal study of 374 RHQ between 1998 and 2010 redresses this omission by asking why RHQ lose their mandates. We apply the concept of absorptive capacity and find two different explanatory mechanisms for full and partial mandate loss driven by RHQ-specific capabilities and location-specific capabilities. Full mandate loss is associated with deficient RHQ-specific capabilities and realised absorptive capacity. By contrast, partial mandate loss is driven by an RHQ's lack of the location-specific capabilities to respond to local changes, leading to removal of mandates for some subunits only. The distinction between full and partial loss offers a more nuanced and granular explanation of how geographic regions of MNCs are composed.

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
Sivut1206-1240
Sivumäärä35
JulkaisuJournal of Management Studies
Vuosikerta54
Numero8
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 1 jouluk. 2017
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Explaining Mandate Loss of Regional Headquarters: The Difference between Full and Partial Loss'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä