TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental comparison of local low velocity unit combined with radiant panel and diffuse ceiling ventilation systems
AU - Zhao, Weixin
AU - Kilpeläinen, Simo
AU - Kosonen, Risto
AU - Jokisalo, Juha
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - In this study, the performance of a micro-environment system was analysed and compared with diffused ceiling ventilation. In the analysed micro-environment low velocity radiant panel system, two low velocity units and radiant panels were installed above workstations to supply directly clean air to occupants and to cover the cooling power required. With diffused ceiling ventilation, all cooling demand is covered with air and thus, the airflow rate required is higher than with low velocity radiant panel system. The varied heat gain from 40 to 80 W/m2 consists of two seated dummies, laptops, monitors and simulated solar gain. The results show that with perimeter exhaust and local supply air, 8–13% reduction of the total cooling load required is possible, in comparison to the standard mixing systems. The average exhaust temperature was 0.7–1.9°C higher than average room air temperature at the workstation. Moreover, the mean air temperature with the low velocity radiant panel system at the occupied zone was 0.6°C lower than with diffused ceiling ventilation. With low velocity radiant panel system, the air velocity was less than 0.12 m/s in the occupied zone. Also, the draught rate was less than 10%. Furthermore, the air change efficiency with the low velocity radiant panel system was over 70% which is better than 44–49% efficiency with diffused ceiling ventilation.
AB - In this study, the performance of a micro-environment system was analysed and compared with diffused ceiling ventilation. In the analysed micro-environment low velocity radiant panel system, two low velocity units and radiant panels were installed above workstations to supply directly clean air to occupants and to cover the cooling power required. With diffused ceiling ventilation, all cooling demand is covered with air and thus, the airflow rate required is higher than with low velocity radiant panel system. The varied heat gain from 40 to 80 W/m2 consists of two seated dummies, laptops, monitors and simulated solar gain. The results show that with perimeter exhaust and local supply air, 8–13% reduction of the total cooling load required is possible, in comparison to the standard mixing systems. The average exhaust temperature was 0.7–1.9°C higher than average room air temperature at the workstation. Moreover, the mean air temperature with the low velocity radiant panel system at the occupied zone was 0.6°C lower than with diffused ceiling ventilation. With low velocity radiant panel system, the air velocity was less than 0.12 m/s in the occupied zone. Also, the draught rate was less than 10%. Furthermore, the air change efficiency with the low velocity radiant panel system was over 70% which is better than 44–49% efficiency with diffused ceiling ventilation.
KW - micro-environment
KW - personalized ventilation
KW - diffuse ceiling ventilation
KW - radiant cooling
KW - thermal comfort
KW - air change efficiency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084792597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1420326X20918398
DO - 10.1177/1420326X20918398
M3 - Article
SN - 1420-326X
VL - 29
SP - 895
EP - 914
JO - Indoor and Built Environment
JF - Indoor and Built Environment
IS - 6
M1 - ARTN 1420326X20918398
ER -