Evasive LWE Assumptions: Definitions, Classes, and Counterexamples

Chris Brzuska*, Akin Ünal, Ivy K.Y. Woo

*Tämän työn vastaava kirjoittaja

Tutkimustuotos: Artikkeli kirjassa/konferenssijulkaisussaConference article in proceedingsScientificvertaisarvioitu

1 Sitaatiot (Scopus)

Abstrakti

The evasive LWE assumption, proposed by Wee [Eurocrypt’22 Wee] for constructing a lattice-based optimal broadcast encryption, has shown to be a powerful assumption, adopted by subsequent works to construct advanced primitives ranging from ABE variants to obfuscation for null circuits. However, a closer look reveals significant differences among the precise assumption statements involved in different works, leading to the fundamental question of how these assumptions compare to each other. In this work, we initiate a more systematic study on evasive LWE assumptions: Based on the standard LWE assumption, we construct simple counterexamples against three private-coin evasive LWE variants, used in [Crypto’22 Tsabary, Asiacrypt’22 VWW, Crypto’23 ARYY] respectively, showing that these assumptions are unlikely to hold.Based on existing evasive LWE variants and our counterexamples, we propose and define three classes of plausible evasive LWE assumptions, suitably capturing all existing variants for which we are not aware of non-obfuscation-based counterexamples.We show that under our assumption formulations, the security proofs of [Asiacrypt’22 VWW] and [Crypto’23 ARYY] can be recovered, and we reason why the security proof of [Crypto’22 Tsabary] is also plausibly repairable using an appropriate evasive LWE assumption. Based on the standard LWE assumption, we construct simple counterexamples against three private-coin evasive LWE variants, used in [Crypto’22 Tsabary, Asiacrypt’22 VWW, Crypto’23 ARYY] respectively, showing that these assumptions are unlikely to hold. Based on existing evasive LWE variants and our counterexamples, we propose and define three classes of plausible evasive LWE assumptions, suitably capturing all existing variants for which we are not aware of non-obfuscation-based counterexamples. We show that under our assumption formulations, the security proofs of [Asiacrypt’22 VWW] and [Crypto’23 ARYY] can be recovered, and we reason why the security proof of [Crypto’22 Tsabary] is also plausibly repairable using an appropriate evasive LWE assumption.

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
OtsikkoAdvances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2024 - 30th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security, Proceedings
ToimittajatKai-Min Chung, Yu Sasaki
KustantajaSpringer
Sivut418-449
Sivumäärä32
Vuosikerta4
ISBN (elektroninen)978-981-96-0894-2
ISBN (painettu)978-981-96-0893-5
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 2025
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa
TapahtumaInternational Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security - Kolkata, Intia
Kesto: 9 jouluk. 202413 jouluk. 2024
Konferenssinumero: 30

Julkaisusarja

NimiLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
KustantajaSpringer
Vuosikerta15487 LNCS
ISSN (painettu)0302-9743
ISSN (elektroninen)1611-3349

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security
LyhennettäASIACRYPT
Maa/AlueIntia
KaupunkiKolkata
Ajanjakso09/12/202413/12/2024

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Evasive LWE Assumptions: Definitions, Classes, and Counterexamples'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä