Erratum: The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Month of Bioethics in Finland-ADDENDUM (Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees (2021) 30 1 (114-122))

Tutkimustuotos: LehtiartikkeliComment/debateScientificvertaisarvioitu

Abstrakti

The role of bioethicists amidst crises like the COVID-19 pandemic is not well defined. As professionals in the field, they should respond, but how? The observation of the early days of pandemic confinement in Finland showed that moral philosophers with limited experience in bioethics tended to apply their favorite theories to public decisions with varying results. Medical ethicists were more likely to lend support to the public authorities by soothing or descriptive accounts of the solutions assumed. These are approaches that Tuija Takala has called the firefighting and window dressing models of bioethics. Human rights lawyers drew attention to the flaws of the government's regulative thinking. Critical bioethicists offered analyses of the arguments presented and the moral and political theories that could be used as the basis of good and acceptable decisions.

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
Sivut204-204
Sivumäärä1
JulkaisuCambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Vuosikerta30
Numero1
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 1 tammik. 2021
OKM-julkaisutyyppiEi sovellu

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Erratum: The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Month of Bioethics in Finland-ADDENDUM (Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees (2021) 30 1 (114-122))'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä