TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective Energy Efficiency of Ultra-reliable Low Latency Communication
AU - Shehab, Mohammad
AU - Alves, Hirley
AU - Jorswieck, Eduard A.
AU - Dosti, Endrit
AU - Latva-aho, Matti
PY - 2021/7/15
Y1 - 2021/7/15
N2 - Effective capacity (EC) defines the maximum communication rate subject to a specific delay constraint, while effective energy efficiency (EEE) indicates the ratio between EC and power consumption. We analyze the EEE of ultrareliable networks operating in the finite-blocklength regime. We obtain a closed-form approximation for the EEE in quasistatic Nakagami- m (and Rayleigh as subcase) fading channels as a function of power, error probability, and latency. Furthermore, we characterize the quality-of-service constrained EEE maximization problem for different power consumption models, which shows a significant difference between finite and infinite-blocklength coding with respect to EEE and optimal power allocation strategy. As asserted in the literature, achieving ultrareliability using one transmission consumes a huge amount of power, which is not applicable for energy limited Internet-of-Things devices. In this context, accounting for empty buffer probability in machine-type communication (MTC) and extending the maximum delay tolerance jointly enhances the EEE and allows for adaptive retransmission of faulty packets. Our analysis reveals that obtaining the optimum error probability for each transmission by minimizing the nonempty buffer probability approaches EEE optimality, while being analytically tractable via Dinkelbach's algorithm. Furthermore, the results illustrate the power saving and the significant EEE gain attained by applying adaptive retransmission protocols, while sacrificing a limited increase in latency.
AB - Effective capacity (EC) defines the maximum communication rate subject to a specific delay constraint, while effective energy efficiency (EEE) indicates the ratio between EC and power consumption. We analyze the EEE of ultrareliable networks operating in the finite-blocklength regime. We obtain a closed-form approximation for the EEE in quasistatic Nakagami- m (and Rayleigh as subcase) fading channels as a function of power, error probability, and latency. Furthermore, we characterize the quality-of-service constrained EEE maximization problem for different power consumption models, which shows a significant difference between finite and infinite-blocklength coding with respect to EEE and optimal power allocation strategy. As asserted in the literature, achieving ultrareliability using one transmission consumes a huge amount of power, which is not applicable for energy limited Internet-of-Things devices. In this context, accounting for empty buffer probability in machine-type communication (MTC) and extending the maximum delay tolerance jointly enhances the EEE and allows for adaptive retransmission of faulty packets. Our analysis reveals that obtaining the optimum error probability for each transmission by minimizing the nonempty buffer probability approaches EEE optimality, while being analytically tractable via Dinkelbach's algorithm. Furthermore, the results illustrate the power saving and the significant EEE gain attained by applying adaptive retransmission protocols, while sacrificing a limited increase in latency.
KW - Delays
KW - Effective energy efficiency
KW - Error probability
KW - finite blocklength
KW - IoT
KW - Measurement
KW - optimal power allocation.
KW - Power demand
KW - Reliability
KW - Resource management
KW - Ultra reliable low latency communication
KW - URLLC
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099727752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3052965
DO - 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3052965
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099727752
SN - 2327-4662
VL - 8
SP - 11135
EP - 11149
JO - IEEE Internet of Things Journal
JF - IEEE Internet of Things Journal
IS - 14
M1 - 9328474
ER -