Effect of different rheological models on the distress prediction of composite pavement

Ki Hoon Moon, Augusto Cannone Falchetto*, Hae Won Park, Di Wang

*Tämän työn vastaava kirjoittaja

Tutkimustuotos: LehtiartikkeliArticleScientificvertaisarvioitu

3 Sitaatiot (Scopus)


In this paper, three different rheological models including a newly developed formulation based on the current Christensen Anderson and Marateanu (CAM) model, named sigmoidal CAM model (SCM), are used to estimate the evolution of roughness, rutting, and reflective cracking in a typical composite pavement structure currently widely adopted in South Korea. Three different asphalt mixtures were prepared and dynamic modulus tests were performed. Then, the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) was used for predicting the progression of the pavement distress and to estimate the effect of the three different models on such phenomena. It is found that the three different mathematical models provide lower and upper limits for roughness, rutting, and reflective cracking. While the CAM model may not be entirely reliable due to its inability in fitting the data in the high-temperature domain, SCM might result in moderately more conservative pavement design.

DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 1 tammik. 2020
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Julkaistu artikkeli, soviteltu


Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Effect of different rheological models on the distress prediction of composite pavement'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Siteeraa tätä