COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SPIN INJECTION AND TRANSPORT IN Alq(3) AND Co-PHTHALOCYANINE-BASED ORGANIC SPIN VALVES

Sayani Majumdar*, Sukumar Dey, Hannu Huhtinen, Johnny Dahl, Marjukka Tuominen, Pekka Laukkanen, Sebastiaan van Dijken, Himadri S. Majumdar

*Tämän työn vastaava kirjoittaja

Tutkimustuotos: LehtiartikkeliArticleScientificvertaisarvioitu

Abstrakti

Recent experimental reports suggest the formation of a highly spin-polarized interface ("spinterface") between a ferromagnetic (FM) Cobalt (Co) electrode and a metal-phthalocyanine (Pc) molecule. Another report shows an almost 60% giant magnetoresistance (GMR) response measured on Co/H2Pc-based single molecule spin valves. In this paper, we compare the spin injection and transport properties of organic spin valves with two different organic spacers, namely Tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato) aluminum (Alq(3)) and CoPc sandwiched between halfmetallic La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO) and Co electrodes. Alq(3)-based spin valves exhibit clear and reproducible spin valve switching with almost 35% negative GMR at 10K, in accordance with previous reports. In contrast, cobalt-pthalocyanine (CoPc)-based spin valves fail to show clear GMR response above noise level despite high expectations based on recent reports. Investigations of electronic, magnetic and magnetotransport properties of electrode/spacer interfaces of LSMO/ CoPc/Co devices offer three plausible explanations for the absence of GMR: (1) CoPc films are strongly chemisorbed on the LSMO surface. This improves the LSMO magnetic properties but also induces local traps at the LSMO interface for spin-polarized charge carriers. (2) At the Co/CoPc interface, diffusion of Co atoms into the organic semiconductor (OS) layer and chemical reactivity between Co and the OS deteriorates the FM properties of Co. This renders the Co/CoPc interface as unsuitable for efficient spin injection. (3) The presence of heavy Co atoms in CoPc leads to large spin-orbit coupling in the spacer. The spin relaxation time in the CoPc layer is therefore considerably smaller compared to Alq(3). Based on these findings, we suggest that the absence of GMR in CoPc-based spin valves is caused by a combined effect of inefficient spin injection from FM contacts and poor spin transport in the CoPc spacer layer.

AlkuperäiskieliEnglanti
Artikkeli1440009
Sivumäärä12
JulkaisuSPIN
Vuosikerta4
Numero2
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - kesäkuuta 2014
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Julkaistu artikkeli, soviteltu

Siteeraa tätä