TY - JOUR
T1 - Application and environmental impact of loose nanofiltration in surface water treatment
AU - Laurell, Panu
AU - Sivonen, Karoliina
AU - Hesampour, Mehrdad
AU - Tuutijärvi, Tanja
AU - Vahala, Riku
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Loose nanofiltration (LNF) membranes with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of about 1000 Da have great potential for high selectivity between natural organic matter (NOM) and mineral salts. Therefore, they are interesting for treatment plants for purifying oligotrophic lake waters with an elevated NOM concentration. This study was conducted to determine the design and operational expenses as well as the environmental impact of an LNF-based drinking water treatment process that removes NOM from Finnish surface water. Two LNF membranes with similar MWCOs were selected, and the results were compared to ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and conventional treatment. One LNF membrane demonstrated a rejection rate of NOM higher than 95 % and a low rejection rate of hardness at about 40 %, while the other LNF membrane performed similarly to an ultrafiltration membrane. The LNF-based treatment process would increase operational expenses by 53—69 % but at the same time decrease the environmental impact by >18 %. Improved removal of aromaticity and low molecular weight compounds could lower the disinfection byproduct formation potential and microbial growth in the network, thus reducing the required chlorine dosage in the network and possibly bringing further cost savings.
AB - Loose nanofiltration (LNF) membranes with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of about 1000 Da have great potential for high selectivity between natural organic matter (NOM) and mineral salts. Therefore, they are interesting for treatment plants for purifying oligotrophic lake waters with an elevated NOM concentration. This study was conducted to determine the design and operational expenses as well as the environmental impact of an LNF-based drinking water treatment process that removes NOM from Finnish surface water. Two LNF membranes with similar MWCOs were selected, and the results were compared to ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and conventional treatment. One LNF membrane demonstrated a rejection rate of NOM higher than 95 % and a low rejection rate of hardness at about 40 %, while the other LNF membrane performed similarly to an ultrafiltration membrane. The LNF-based treatment process would increase operational expenses by 53—69 % but at the same time decrease the environmental impact by >18 %. Improved removal of aromaticity and low molecular weight compounds could lower the disinfection byproduct formation potential and microbial growth in the network, thus reducing the required chlorine dosage in the network and possibly bringing further cost savings.
KW - Cost estimation
KW - Environmental impact
KW - Loose nanofiltration
KW - Natural organic matter
KW - Surface water treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188090396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105174
DO - 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105174
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85188090396
SN - 2214-7144
VL - 60
JO - Journal of Water Process Engineering
JF - Journal of Water Process Engineering
M1 - 105174
ER -