Abandoning the concept of renewable energy

Tutkimustuotos: Lehtiartikkelivertaisarvioitu

Standard

Abandoning the concept of renewable energy. / Harjanne, Atte; Korhonen, Janne M.

julkaisussa: Energy Policy, Vuosikerta 127, 01.04.2019, s. 330-340.

Tutkimustuotos: Lehtiartikkelivertaisarvioitu

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Harjanne, Atte ; Korhonen, Janne M. / Abandoning the concept of renewable energy. Julkaisussa: Energy Policy. 2019 ; Vuosikerta 127. Sivut 330-340.

Bibtex - Lataa

@article{a220696e0acd4a53bf7be04d4fcbc399,
title = "Abandoning the concept of renewable energy",
abstract = "Renewable energy is a widely used term that describes certain types of energy production. In politics, business and academia, renewable energy is often framed as the key solution to the global climate challenge. We, however, argue that the concept of renewable energy is problematic and should be abandoned in favor of more unambiguous conceptualization. Building on the theoretical literature on framing and based on document analysis, case examples and statistical data, we discuss how renewable energy is framed and has come to be a central energy policy concept and analyze how its use has affected the way energy policy is debated and conducted. We demonstrate the key problems the concept of renewable energy has in terms of sustainability, incoherence, policy impacts, bait-and-switch tactics and generally misleading nature. After analyzing these issues, we discuss alternative conceptualizations and present our model of categorizing energy production according to carbon content and combustion. The paper does not intend to criticize or promote any specific form of energy production, but instead discusses the role of institutional conceptualization in energy policy.",
keywords = "Climate change, Energy policy, Framing, Institutional theory, Renewable energy",
author = "Atte Harjanne and Korhonen, {Janne M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.029",
language = "English",
volume = "127",
pages = "330--340",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",

}

RIS - Lataa

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abandoning the concept of renewable energy

AU - Harjanne, Atte

AU - Korhonen, Janne M.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Renewable energy is a widely used term that describes certain types of energy production. In politics, business and academia, renewable energy is often framed as the key solution to the global climate challenge. We, however, argue that the concept of renewable energy is problematic and should be abandoned in favor of more unambiguous conceptualization. Building on the theoretical literature on framing and based on document analysis, case examples and statistical data, we discuss how renewable energy is framed and has come to be a central energy policy concept and analyze how its use has affected the way energy policy is debated and conducted. We demonstrate the key problems the concept of renewable energy has in terms of sustainability, incoherence, policy impacts, bait-and-switch tactics and generally misleading nature. After analyzing these issues, we discuss alternative conceptualizations and present our model of categorizing energy production according to carbon content and combustion. The paper does not intend to criticize or promote any specific form of energy production, but instead discusses the role of institutional conceptualization in energy policy.

AB - Renewable energy is a widely used term that describes certain types of energy production. In politics, business and academia, renewable energy is often framed as the key solution to the global climate challenge. We, however, argue that the concept of renewable energy is problematic and should be abandoned in favor of more unambiguous conceptualization. Building on the theoretical literature on framing and based on document analysis, case examples and statistical data, we discuss how renewable energy is framed and has come to be a central energy policy concept and analyze how its use has affected the way energy policy is debated and conducted. We demonstrate the key problems the concept of renewable energy has in terms of sustainability, incoherence, policy impacts, bait-and-switch tactics and generally misleading nature. After analyzing these issues, we discuss alternative conceptualizations and present our model of categorizing energy production according to carbon content and combustion. The paper does not intend to criticize or promote any specific form of energy production, but instead discusses the role of institutional conceptualization in energy policy.

KW - Climate change

KW - Energy policy

KW - Framing

KW - Institutional theory

KW - Renewable energy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059081263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.029

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.029

M3 - Article

VL - 127

SP - 330

EP - 340

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -

ID: 30993973