Why We Should Not Use Externally Imposed Value Points in Conducting Multiple Issue Negotiation Experiments

J. Teich; Pekka Korhonen; H. Wallenius; J. Wallenius

Why We Should Not Use Externally Imposed Value Points in Conducting Multiple Issue Negotiation Experiments

J. Teich
, Pekka Korhonen
, H. Wallenius
, J. Wallenius

New Mexico State University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

Original language	English
Title of host publication	DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE, 1997 ANNUAL MEETING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3
Editors	E.P. Robinson
Publisher	Decision Science Institute
Pages	1015-1018
Number of pages	4
Publication status	Published - 1997
MoE publication type	A4 Conference publication
Event	Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting - San Diego, United States Duration: 22 Nov 1997 → 25 Nov 1997

Conference

Conference	Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting
Country/Territory	United States
City	San Diego
Period	22/11/1997 → 25/11/1997

Keywords

decision making experiments
multiple criteria
value points

Cite this

@inproceedings{b1259737df2d4d87b33594752612c1f4,

title = "Why We Should Not Use Externally Imposed Value Points in Conducting Multiple Issue Negotiation Experiments",

keywords = "decision making experiments, multiple criteria, value points, decision making experiments, multiple criteria, value points, decision making experiments, multiple criteria, value points",

author = "J. Teich and Pekka Korhonen and H. Wallenius and J. Wallenius",

year = "1997",

language = "English",

pages = "1015--1018",

editor = "E.P. Robinson",

booktitle = "DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE, 1997 ANNUAL MEETING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3",

publisher = "Decision Science Institute",

address = "United States",

note = "Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting ; Conference date: 22-11-1997 Through 25-11-1997",

}

Teich, J, Korhonen, P, Wallenius, H & Wallenius, J 1997, Why We Should Not Use Externally Imposed Value Points in Conducting Multiple Issue Negotiation Experiments. in EP Robinson (ed.), DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE, 1997 ANNUAL MEETING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3. Decision Science Institute, pp. 1015-1018, Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting , San Diego, California, United States, 22/11/1997.

Why We Should Not Use Externally Imposed Value Points in Conducting Multiple Issue Negotiation Experiments. / Teich, J.; Korhonen, Pekka; Wallenius, H. et al.
DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE, 1997 ANNUAL MEETING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3. ed. / E.P. Robinson. Decision Science Institute, 1997. p. 1015-1018.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Why We Should Not Use Externally Imposed Value Points in Conducting Multiple Issue Negotiation Experiments

AU - Teich, J.

AU - Korhonen, Pekka

AU - Wallenius, H.

AU - Wallenius, J.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

KW - decision making experiments

KW - multiple criteria

KW - value points

KW - decision making experiments

KW - multiple criteria

KW - value points

KW - decision making experiments

KW - multiple criteria

KW - value points

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SP - 1015

EP - 1018

BT - DECISION SCIENCES INSTITUTE, 1997 ANNUAL MEETING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3

A2 - Robinson, E.P.

PB - Decision Science Institute

T2 - Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting

Y2 - 22 November 1997 through 25 November 1997

ER -