Abstract
This is part 3 of 6 of the dossier What do we talk about when we talk about queer death?, edited by M. Petricola. The contributions collected in this article sit at the crossroads between thanatology, critical animal studies, and the posthumanities and tackle questions such as: how can queer death studies deconstruct our perception of non-human deaths? How can we rethink human death from a non-anthropocentric perspective? And how can queer death studies approach the COVID-19 pandemic? The present article includes the following contributions: – Beccaro C. and Tuckett M., The life cycle of the agaonidae wasp: death, queerness, and the shattering of the human; – Langhi R., Corpses are remains: queering human/animal boundaries across death; – Véliz S., Tilting points of reference: how nonhuman death narratives unsettle research; – Varino S., (Un)doing viral time: queer temporalities of living & dying in pandemic times; – Pevere M., Recalcitrant by nature: queering death through biological art practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 631-654 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Whatever |
| Volume | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jun 2021 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Funding
This research is supported by the Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológi-ca, grant numbers FONDECYT 11800700, PIA 160007, SOC 180023 and CONICYT-PCHA/Doctor-ado Nacional/ 2016-21160817.
Keywords
- Animal studies
- Death Studies
- Posthumanism
- Queer Studies
- Thanatology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What do we talk about when we talk about queer death? 3/Queering death beyond the human'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver