Abstract
We give two social aggregation theorems under conditions of risk, one for constant population cases, the other an extension to variable populations. Intra and interpersonal welfare comparisons are encoded in a single 'individual preorder'. The theorems give axioms that uniquely determine a social preorder in terms of this individual preorder. The social preorders described by these theorems have features that may be considered characteristic of Harsanyi-style utilitarianism, such as indifference to ex ante and ex post equality. However, the theorems are also consistent with the rejection of all of the expected utility axioms, completeness, continuity, and independence, at both the individual and social levels. In that sense, expected utility is inessential to Harsanyi-style utilitarianism. In fact, the variable population theorem imposes only a mild constraint on the individual preorder, while the constant population theorem imposes no constraint at all. We then derive further results under the assumption of our basic axioms. First, the individual preorder satisfies the main expected utility axiom of strong independence if and only if the social preorder has a vector-valued expected total utility representation, covering Harsanyi's utilitarian theorem as a special case. Second, stronger utilitarian-friendly assumptions, like Pareto or strong separability, are essentially equivalent to strong independence. Third, if the individual preorder satisfies a 'local expected utility' condition popular in non-expected utility theory, then the social preorder has a 'local expected total utility' representation. Fourth, a wide range of non-expected utility theories nevertheless lead to social preorders of outcomes that have been seen as canonically egalitarian, such as rank-dependent social preorders. Although our aggregation theorems are stated under conditions of risk, they are valid in more general frameworks for representing uncertainty or ambiguity. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 77-113 |
| Number of pages | 37 |
| Journal | Journal of Mathematical Economics |
| Volume | 87 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2020 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Funding
We are grateful to Peter Wakker and John Weymark for valuable advice. We have benefited greatly from sets of comments from two anonymous referees. The comments from one referee were exceptionally detailed and generous. David McCarthy thanks the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (HKU 750012H) for support. Teruji Thomas thanks the Arts and Humanities Research Council, United Kingdom for a research studentship, and the Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom (RPG-2014-064).
Keywords
- Harsanyi
- Utilitarianism
- Expected and non-expected utility
- Incompleteness and discontinuity
- Uncertainty
- Variable populations
- SOCIAL AGGREGATION THEOREM
- BAYESIAN DECISION-THEORY
- MARGINAL UTILITY
- INTERPERSONAL COMPARISONS
- INDIVIDUALISTIC ETHICS
- PREFERENCE AGGREGATION
- INFORMATIONAL BASIS
- WELFARE ECONOMICS
- CARDINAL WELFARE
- RISK
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Utilitarianism with and without expected utility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver