Timescapes of CCS Projects: Is Deferring Projects and Policies Just Kicking the can Down the Road?

Farid Karimi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

124 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

CCS is considered a transition measure to a completely sustainable energy regime. Nonetheless, in recent years, several projects have been cancelled or postponed. This raises some questions about temporal issues.

This study defines temporal features (i.e. frame, timing, tempo, and duration) for policy making and deployment of large-scale CCS projects. According to this study, it appears that CCS deployment is lagging behind due to institutional inertia and poor temporal fit. Thus, unless significant progress is made in a very few years, CCS will lose ground to other alternatives. Timing should be taken into consideration in every matter of CCS.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-13, 14-18 November 2016, Lausanne, Switzerland
PublisherElsevier
Pages7317–7325
Publication statusPublished - 2017
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
EventInternational Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies - Lausanne, Switzerland
Duration: 14 Nov 201618 Nov 2016
Conference number: 13

Publication series

NameENERGY PROCEDIA
PublisherElsevier BV
Volume114
ISSN (Print)1876-6102

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies
Abbreviated titleGHGT
CountrySwitzerland
CityLausanne
Period14/11/201618/11/2016

Keywords

  • CCS
  • policy
  • Climate change
  • Carbon Capture and Storage
  • time
  • policymaking
  • GHG

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Timescapes of CCS Projects: Is Deferring Projects and Policies Just Kicking the can Down the Road?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this