The New Brussels I Regime and Arbitration: Finding an Interface

Petra Hietanen-Kunwald, Riikka Koulu, Santtu Turunen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

As the revision process of Brussels I Regime has focused on the abolition of exequatur procedures, the interface between the Regulation and arbitration has been mostly a side note. Regardless of the fact that the systems of the Brussels I Regime and arbitration are two separate autonomous systems, overlapping issues arise. These interfaces have been discussed in the case-law of ECJ and later during the revision process. In the end, recitals elaborating the interface were added to the preamble of the Regulation, but no changes to the arbitration exclusion were introduced. The recital 12 aims to clarify how the arbitration exclusion adopted in the Regulation should be interpreted in the future. However, future case-law of ECJ is elemental to define the full meaning of the recitals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-114
Number of pages21
JournalLeXonomica: revija za pravo in ekonomijo
Volume8
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2016
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • arbitration
  • Brussels I
  • European procedural law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The New Brussels I Regime and Arbitration: Finding an Interface'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this