The effects of dimmable road lighting: A comparison of measured and perceived visibility

Sanaz Bozorg Chenani, Mikko Maksimainen, Eino Tetri, Iisakki Kosonen, Tapio Luttinen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By dimming road lighting, energy can be conserved without compromising traffic safety. This paper presents a study carried out on the effect of different lighting levels from road luminaires on drivers’ visual performance on a low traffic urban road. The small uniform target was used to evaluate the visibility performance of the drivers. The results obtained from subjective graded visibility were compared with contrast and the Adrian model. Results indicated a strong correlation between subjective graded visibility and contrast (R2 = 0.94) and a positive correlation between subjective graded visibility and the Adrian model (R2 = 0.88). Target's location in relation to road luminaires had a considerable effect on its visibility. However, visibility is not a monotonic function of road lighting level. In the absence of glare from an oncoming car, 49% (3557 lm) of road lighting intensity provided better contrast and mean visibility than 100% (7252 lm) and 71% (5179 lm) of road lighting intensities. The glare from oncoming cars reduced visibility. However, no statistically significant effect of road lighting level on visibility under glare could be found.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-156
JournalTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F: TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR
Volume43
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Sept 2016
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • night driving
  • visibility
  • road lighting intensities
  • car headlights
  • luminance contrast

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of dimmable road lighting: A comparison of measured and perceived visibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this