The correct way of splitting tools - Optimization of instrument design for measuring contact stress distribution

Sampsa V.A. Laakso; Volodymyr Bushlya; Jan Eric Ståhl

doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.062

The correct way of splitting tools - Optimization of instrument design for measuring contact stress distribution

Sampsa V.A. Laakso^*
, Volodymyr Bushlya
, Jan Eric Ståhl

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Energy and Mechanical Engineering

Lund University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

165 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Contact stress on the tool has been measured with a split-tool apparatus that has a poor resolution of the stress distribution, and with photoelastic tools that cannot be used with real cutting parameters since the materials are too weak. This paper presents an improved split-tool design allowing continuous stress distribution dataset instead of discreet steps by using a tilted separation plane between the tool tip and the tool body. This paper optimizes the separation plane angle with 3D-FEM to minimize deflection.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the Swedish Production Symposium (SPS 2018)
Publisher	Elsevier
Pages	97-102
Number of pages	6
Volume	25
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.062
Publication status	Published - 25 Jul 2018
MoE publication type	A4 Conference publication
Event	Swedish Production Symposium - Stockholm, Sweden Duration: 16 May 2018 → 18 May 2018 Conference number: 8

Publication series

Name	Procedia Manufacturing
Publisher	Elsevier BV
ISSN (Print)	2351-9789

Conference

Conference	Swedish Production Symposium
Abbreviated title	SPS
Country/Territory	Sweden
City	Stockholm
Period	16/05/2018 → 18/05/2018

Keywords

separated by semicolons
Type your keywords here

Access to Document

10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.062

ENG_Laakso_et_al_The_correct_way_of_splitting_tools_Procedia_ManufacturingFinal published version, 1.08 MBLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@inproceedings{98d0e3c6f8b444ae85f87dc7e0fbed99,

title = "The correct way of splitting tools - Optimization of instrument design for measuring contact stress distribution",

abstract = "Contact stress on the tool has been measured with a split-tool apparatus that has a poor resolution of the stress distribution, and with photoelastic tools that cannot be used with real cutting parameters since the materials are too weak. This paper presents an improved split-tool design allowing continuous stress distribution dataset instead of discreet steps by using a tilted separation plane between the tool tip and the tool body. This paper optimizes the separation plane angle with 3D-FEM to minimize deflection.",

keywords = "separated by semicolons, Type your keywords here",

author = "Laakso, \{Sampsa V.A.\} and Volodymyr Bushlya and St{\aa}hl, \{Jan Eric\}",

year = "2018",

month = jul,

day = "25",

doi = "10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.062",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

series = "Procedia Manufacturing",

publisher = "Elsevier",

pages = "97--102",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the Swedish Production Symposium (SPS 2018)",

address = "Netherlands",

note = "Swedish Production Symposium, SPS ; Conference date: 16-05-2018 Through 18-05-2018",

}

Laakso, SVA, Bushlya, V & Ståhl, JE 2018, The correct way of splitting tools - Optimization of instrument design for measuring contact stress distribution. in Proceedings of the Swedish Production Symposium (SPS 2018). vol. 25, Procedia Manufacturing, Elsevier, pp. 97-102, Swedish Production Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, 16/05/2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.062

The correct way of splitting tools - Optimization of instrument design for measuring contact stress distribution. / Laakso, Sampsa V.A.; Bushlya, Volodymyr; Ståhl, Jan Eric.
Proceedings of the Swedish Production Symposium (SPS 2018). Vol. 25 Elsevier, 2018. p. 97-102 (Procedia Manufacturing).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - The correct way of splitting tools - Optimization of instrument design for measuring contact stress distribution

AU - Laakso, Sampsa V.A.

AU - Bushlya, Volodymyr

AU - Ståhl, Jan Eric

N1 - Conference code: 8

PY - 2018/7/25

Y1 - 2018/7/25

N2 - Contact stress on the tool has been measured with a split-tool apparatus that has a poor resolution of the stress distribution, and with photoelastic tools that cannot be used with real cutting parameters since the materials are too weak. This paper presents an improved split-tool design allowing continuous stress distribution dataset instead of discreet steps by using a tilted separation plane between the tool tip and the tool body. This paper optimizes the separation plane angle with 3D-FEM to minimize deflection.

AB - Contact stress on the tool has been measured with a split-tool apparatus that has a poor resolution of the stress distribution, and with photoelastic tools that cannot be used with real cutting parameters since the materials are too weak. This paper presents an improved split-tool design allowing continuous stress distribution dataset instead of discreet steps by using a tilted separation plane between the tool tip and the tool body. This paper optimizes the separation plane angle with 3D-FEM to minimize deflection.

KW - separated by semicolons

KW - Type your keywords here

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85065660732

U2 - 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.062

DO - 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.062

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

AN - SCOPUS:85065660732

VL - 25

T3 - Procedia Manufacturing

SP - 97

EP - 102

BT - Proceedings of the Swedish Production Symposium (SPS 2018)

PB - Elsevier

T2 - Swedish Production Symposium

Y2 - 16 May 2018 through 18 May 2018

ER -

The correct way of splitting tools - Optimization of instrument design for measuring contact stress distribution

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this