Testing the Accuracy of Surface Code Decoders

Large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computations will be enabled by quantum error-correcting codes (QECC). This work presents the first systematic technique to test the accuracy and effectiveness of different QECC decoding schemes by comparing a look-up table decoder to solutions generated using algorithmic decoders. Specifically, we examine the results of minimum-weight-perfect-matching and belief-propagation decoders against exhaustive look-up tables for surface codes up to distance seven and categorise where errors are accurately corrected in both decoding schemes. While our results are preliminary, we show that significant quantitative results can be generated, comparing how actual error channels are successfully or unsuccessfully decoded. We show that different decoding schemes perform very differently under the same QECC scheme and error model, and detail how decoders can be tested and classified with respect to errors that are successfully decodable. This work paves the way to the data driven tuning of decoder ensembles and will enable tailored design of hybrid decoding schemes that allow for real-time decoding, while maintaining the high theoretical thresholds allowed by specific quantum error correction codes.