Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics journals

Anne M. Quarshie*, Asta Salmi, Rudolf Leuschner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

134 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sustainability has become a popular topic, not only in business research at large, but specifically in the supply chain management (SCM) discipline. In addition, the business ethics (BE) field has an extensive stream of literature focusing on supply chain topics. While some exchange of ideas can be witnessed, the two streams developed largely independently. A key purpose of this article is to examine and contrast existing research and knowledge creation, focusing on sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) issues in supply chains, within and across these two disciplines. The in-depth systematic literature review covers 195 articles, published in 12 peer-reviewed journals from 2007 to 2013, examining the methodological and theoretical approaches, as well as the main research focus areas. We found highly complementary research topic areas but only limited synergy and dialogue between the disciplines. The research area at large would benefit from greater integration. Based on our findings, we propose a future research agenda that connects across the disciplines and highlights key areas that would benefit from further inquiry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82–97
JournalJournal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • A systematic literature review
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Ethics
  • Purchasing and supply management
  • Supply chain management
  • Sustainability

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics journals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this