Summary: Executive decision synthesis paradigm

Victor Tang*, Kevin Otto, Warren Seering

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We have two goals for this chapter. The first is to present a summary of the key ideas of our prescriptive decision paradigm. Second is to state the overarching concepts of our paradigm. These concepts are “like the skeleton, which, invisible to the naked eye, gives form and function to the body” (Morgenthau, Politics among nations. Alferd A. Knopf, 1960). These concepts are faintly visible throughout the book, but they form the skeleton of our book. We must be clear that we are making no claims about paradigm as theory. We are grounded on theory, but we are not building theory. Third, we will argue that we a rigorous paradigm. To demonstrate rigor, we submit our paradigm to tests of theory formulated by scholars. These tests of theory are the “eye of the needle” to demonstrate the paradigm’s rigor, not to claim to theory. But nevertheless, we will thread the needle. We conclude that we have a rigorous prescriptive paradigm for robust executive decisions. The functionality and efficacy of our systematic process is verified by our simulations and case studies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationContributions to Management Science
PublisherSpringer
Pages625-646
Number of pages22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2018
MoE publication typeA3 Book section, Chapters in research books

Publication series

NameContributions to Management Science
ISSN (Print)1431-1941
ISSN (Electronic)2197-716X

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Summary: Executive decision synthesis paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this