Stakeholder Judgments of Value

Leena Lankoski, N. Craig Smith, Luk Van Wassenhove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although central to stakeholder theory, stakeholder value is surprisingly neglected in the literature. We draw upon prospect theory to show how stakeholder judgments of value depend crucially on the reference state, how there are several alternative reference states that may be operative when stakeholders judge value, how the choice of reference state for stakeholders' value judgments can occur intuitively or deliberately, and how the level of the operant reference state may change with time and may also be incorrectly perceived by stakeholders or managers. Our theorizing results in a fundamentally different way of perceiving the value of corporate actions to stakeholders and shifts understanding of the avenues available for companies and others to influence stakeholder judgments of value. This novel perspective has implications both for theory and management practice, and not least for normative business ethics, if business is about stakeholder value creation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-256
Number of pages30
JournalBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Normative Business Ethics
  • Prospect Theory
  • Reference States
  • Stakeholder Judgments
  • Stakeholder Theory
  • Stakeholder Value

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Stakeholder Judgments of Value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this