TY - JOUR
T1 - Single-trial classification of evoked responses to auditory tones using OPM- and SQUID-MEG
AU - Iivanainen, Joonas
AU - Carter, Tony R.
AU - Trumbo, Michael C.S.
AU - McKay, Jim
AU - Taulu, Samu
AU - Wang, Jun
AU - Stephen, Julia M.
AU - Schwindt, Peter D.D.
AU - Borna, Amir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2023/10/1
Y1 - 2023/10/1
N2 - Objective. Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) are emerging as a near-room-temperature alternative to superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) for magnetoencephalography (MEG). In contrast to SQUIDs, OPMs can be placed in a close proximity to subject’s scalp potentially increasing the signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution of MEG. However, experimental demonstrations of these suggested benefits are still scarce. Here, to compare a 24-channel OPM-MEG system to a commercial whole-head SQUID system in a data-driven way, we quantified their performance in classifying single-trial evoked responses. Approach. We measured evoked responses to three auditory tones in six participants using both OPM- and SQUID-MEG systems. We performed pairwise temporal classification of the single-trial responses with linear discriminant analysis as well as multiclass classification with both EEGNet convolutional neural network and xDAWN decoding. Main results. OPMs provided higher classification accuracies than SQUIDs having a similar coverage of the left hemisphere of the participant. However, the SQUID sensors covering the whole helmet had classification scores larger than those of OPMs for two of the tone pairs, demonstrating the benefits of a whole-head measurement. Significance. The results demonstrate that the current OPM-MEG system provides high-quality data about the brain with room for improvement for high bandwidth non-invasive brain-computer interfacing.
AB - Objective. Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) are emerging as a near-room-temperature alternative to superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) for magnetoencephalography (MEG). In contrast to SQUIDs, OPMs can be placed in a close proximity to subject’s scalp potentially increasing the signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution of MEG. However, experimental demonstrations of these suggested benefits are still scarce. Here, to compare a 24-channel OPM-MEG system to a commercial whole-head SQUID system in a data-driven way, we quantified their performance in classifying single-trial evoked responses. Approach. We measured evoked responses to three auditory tones in six participants using both OPM- and SQUID-MEG systems. We performed pairwise temporal classification of the single-trial responses with linear discriminant analysis as well as multiclass classification with both EEGNet convolutional neural network and xDAWN decoding. Main results. OPMs provided higher classification accuracies than SQUIDs having a similar coverage of the left hemisphere of the participant. However, the SQUID sensors covering the whole helmet had classification scores larger than those of OPMs for two of the tone pairs, demonstrating the benefits of a whole-head measurement. Significance. The results demonstrate that the current OPM-MEG system provides high-quality data about the brain with room for improvement for high bandwidth non-invasive brain-computer interfacing.
KW - auditory cortex
KW - brain-computer interface
KW - classification
KW - decoding
KW - magnetoencephalography
KW - optically pumped magnetometer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175043157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1741-2552/acfcd9
DO - 10.1088/1741-2552/acfcd9
M3 - Article
C2 - 37748476
AN - SCOPUS:85175043157
SN - 1741-2560
VL - 20
JO - Journal of Neural Engineering
JF - Journal of Neural Engineering
IS - 5
M1 - 056032
ER -