TY - JOUR
T1 - Responding to Uncertainties in COVID-19 with Real Options
T2 - The Perspective of Governments
AU - Chakhovich, Terhi
AU - Marttila, Saija
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank the Emil Aaltonen Foundation for their funding of the research upon which this paper is based. The authors would also like to thank Virginia Mattila for language checking and Thomas Brand, Vikash Sinha and Thomas Taussi for their helpful ideas which motivated the present paper. Thanks are also due to the representatives of the Finnish Government for their handling of the COVID-19 crisis.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020– All Rights Reserved
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - COVID-19 has affected people, businesses and governments worldwide, causing widespread uncertainty in the business world. Here we look at COVID-19 uncertainty using the tool of real options. We focus on the perspective of governments, particularly the Finnish Government, which in its decisions has endeavoured to keep many of its options open in this situation. We describe the real options relevant here, how uncertainty impacts them and also how selected cognitive biases may influence the decisions through the use of such real options. The real options discussed are the option to delay, the time-to-build option, the option to alter scale and the option to switch. The cognitive biases relevant here are the status quo bias and the confirmation bias. The study extends the research on real options by scrutinising a highly topical case. The study also offers guidance to governments on how to respond to the COVID-19 crisis. Moreover, the study provides suggestions on how to evaluate governmental decisions in the COVID-19 crisis. This study addresses a highly topical phenomenon, the COVID-19 crisis, in order to shed light on how real options can be used as a tool to analyse such a crisis.
AB - COVID-19 has affected people, businesses and governments worldwide, causing widespread uncertainty in the business world. Here we look at COVID-19 uncertainty using the tool of real options. We focus on the perspective of governments, particularly the Finnish Government, which in its decisions has endeavoured to keep many of its options open in this situation. We describe the real options relevant here, how uncertainty impacts them and also how selected cognitive biases may influence the decisions through the use of such real options. The real options discussed are the option to delay, the time-to-build option, the option to alter scale and the option to switch. The cognitive biases relevant here are the status quo bias and the confirmation bias. The study extends the research on real options by scrutinising a highly topical case. The study also offers guidance to governments on how to respond to the COVID-19 crisis. Moreover, the study provides suggestions on how to evaluate governmental decisions in the COVID-19 crisis. This study addresses a highly topical phenomenon, the COVID-19 crisis, in order to shed light on how real options can be used as a tool to analyse such a crisis.
KW - COVID-19
KW - government
KW - real option
KW - uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126766804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.55365/1923.X2020.18.07
DO - 10.55365/1923.X2020.18.07
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126766804
SN - 1923-7529
VL - 18
SP - 69
EP - 74
JO - Review of Economics and Finance
JF - Review of Economics and Finance
ER -