TY - JOUR
T1 - Removing artifacts from TMS-evoked EEG: A methods review and a unifying theoretical framework
AU - Hernandez-Pavon, Julio C.
AU - Kugiumtzis, Dimitris
AU - Zrenner, Christoph
AU - Kimiskidis, Vasilios K.
AU - Metsomaa, Johanna
N1 - Funding Information:
JCHP and JM wish to thank Prof. Jukka Sarvas for enlightening discussions over the years regarding the beamforming theory and interpretations and for being one of the greatest mentors. This project has received funding from the Emil Aaltonen Foundation and Finnish Science Foundation for Technology and Economics .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electroencephalography (EEG) is a technique for studying cortical excitability and connectivity in health and disease, allowing basic research and potential clinical applications. A major methodological issue, severely limiting the applicability of TMS–EEG, relates to the contamination of EEG signals by artifacts of biologic or non-biologic origin. To solve this problem, several methods, based on independent component analysis (ICA), principal component analysis (PCA), signal space projection (SSP), and other approaches, have been developed over the last decade. This article is divided into two parts. In the first part, we review the theoretical background of the currently available TMS–EEG artifact removal methods. In the second part, we formally introduce the mathematics underpinnings of the cleaning methods. We classify them into spatial and temporal filters based on their properties. Since the most frequently used TMS–EEG cleaning approach are spatial filter methods, we focus on them and introduce beamforming as a unified framework of the most popular spatial filtering techniques. This unifying approach enables the comparative assessment of these methods by highlighting their differences in terms of assumptions, challenges, and applicability for different types of artifacts and data. The different properties and challenges of the methods discussed are illustrated with both simulated and recorded data. This article targets non-mathematical and mathematical audiences. Accordingly, those readers interested in essential background information on these methods can focus on Section 2. Whereas theory-oriented readers may find Section 3 helpful for making informed decisions between existing methods and developing the methodology further.
AB - Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electroencephalography (EEG) is a technique for studying cortical excitability and connectivity in health and disease, allowing basic research and potential clinical applications. A major methodological issue, severely limiting the applicability of TMS–EEG, relates to the contamination of EEG signals by artifacts of biologic or non-biologic origin. To solve this problem, several methods, based on independent component analysis (ICA), principal component analysis (PCA), signal space projection (SSP), and other approaches, have been developed over the last decade. This article is divided into two parts. In the first part, we review the theoretical background of the currently available TMS–EEG artifact removal methods. In the second part, we formally introduce the mathematics underpinnings of the cleaning methods. We classify them into spatial and temporal filters based on their properties. Since the most frequently used TMS–EEG cleaning approach are spatial filter methods, we focus on them and introduce beamforming as a unified framework of the most popular spatial filtering techniques. This unifying approach enables the comparative assessment of these methods by highlighting their differences in terms of assumptions, challenges, and applicability for different types of artifacts and data. The different properties and challenges of the methods discussed are illustrated with both simulated and recorded data. This article targets non-mathematical and mathematical audiences. Accordingly, those readers interested in essential background information on these methods can focus on Section 2. Whereas theory-oriented readers may find Section 3 helpful for making informed decisions between existing methods and developing the methodology further.
KW - Artifacts
KW - Beamforming
KW - Electroencephalography
KW - Independent component analysis
KW - Principal component analysis
KW - Signal space projection
KW - Spatial filters
KW - Temporal filters
KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130316672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109591
DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109591
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 35421514
AN - SCOPUS:85130316672
SN - 0165-0270
VL - 376
SP - 1
EP - 21
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
M1 - 109591
ER -