(Re)design to mitigate political polarization: Reflecting Habermas’ ideal communication space in the United States of America and Finland

Matti Nelimarkka*, Jean Philippe Rancy, Jennifer Grygiel, Bryan Semaan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social Media platforms are increasingly being used for political activities and communication, and research suggests that social media design and use is contributing to the polarization of the public sphere. This study draws on Habermas’ ideals concerning deliberative democracy to explore if novel interface designs that diversify information sources through content recommendation, can decrease polarization. Through a design-probe interview approach and insights generated from 19 political and citizen experts in Finland and the United States, we found that our deliberative design can lead to depolarization, while creating additional complexity through which users question content and information. We discuss the need to move beyond naive content recommendation, and user interface level changes, in order to work towards a depolarized public sphere.

Original languageEnglish
Article number141
Pages (from-to)1-25
JournalProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Volume3
Issue numberCSCW
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Comparative research
  • Habermas
  • Political polarization
  • Social media
  • Speculative design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '(Re)design to mitigate political polarization: Reflecting Habermas’ ideal communication space in the United States of America and Finland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this