Redefining maladaptation

Sirkku Juhola*, Erik Glaas, Bjorn-Ola Linner, Tina-Simone Neset

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As experiences of implementation of climate change adaptation are accumulating, there is a need to increase the understanding of the potential negative consequences of adaptation actions that might occur, and the capacity of research to assess them. Maladaptation used in this context has remained elusively defined and sparingly used, and therefore difficult to apply. Based on a literature review, we discuss the conceptual boundaries of maladaptation and how it can be used to analyse negative outcomes of adaptation and propose a refined definition. We present a typology of maladaptation that distinguishes between three types of maladaptive outcomes - rebounding vulnerability, shifting vulnerability and eroding sustainable development, and argue that maladaptation can be defined as a result of an intentional adaptation policy or measure directly increasing vulnerability for the targeted and/or external actor(s), and/or eroding preconditions for sustainable development by indirectly increasing society's vulnerability. We note that the recognition of adaptation as an intentional action and the importance of setting clear spatial and temporal boundaries, as well as thresholds, are key to analysing negative outcomes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-140
Number of pages6
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Adaptation
  • Maladaptation
  • Vulnerability
  • Feedbacks
  • CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION
  • ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
  • VULNERABILITY
  • FRAMEWORK
  • IMPACTS

Cite this