Reacting to criticism : What motivates top leaders to respond substantively to negative social performance feedback?

Myrto Chliova*, Gabriella Cacciotti, Teemu Kautonen, Ignacio Pavez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The responses of organizations in situations of negative feedback from stakeholders are attracting increasing scholarly and societal attention. The literature has so far largely focused on situational factors that direct such responses, while calling for a more acute examination of individual factors. Anchored in Stakeholder Theory and Trait Activation Theory, this study examines how and to what extent prosocial motivation (a normative-oriented trait) and fear of failure (an instrumental-oriented trait) determine organizational leaders’ substantive responses to negative social performance feedback. We test our predictions on two waves of original survey data, including a conjoint experiment, on a sample of leaders of young organizations. Our findings contribute to literature and practice related to organizational responses to social performance feedback.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115005
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume186
Early online date9 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Feedback
  • Social performance
  • Stakeholder theory
  • Substantive response
  • Trait activation theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reacting to criticism : What motivates top leaders to respond substantively to negative social performance feedback?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this