Qualifying drug dosing regimens in pediatrics using Gaussian processes

Eero Siivola*, Sebastian Weber, Aki Vehtari

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
61 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Drug development commonly studies an adult population first and then the pediatric population. The knowledge from the adult population is taken advantage of for the design of the pediatric trials. Adjusted drug doses for these are often derived from adult pharmacokinetic (PK) models which are extrapolated to patients with smaller body size. This extrapolation is based on scaling physiologic model parameters with a body size measure accounting for organ size differences. The inherent assumption is that children are merely small adults. However, children can be subject to additional effects such as organ maturation. These effects are not present in the adult population and are possibly overlooked at the design stage of the pediatric trials. It is thus crucial to qualify the extrapolation assumptions once the pediatric trial data are available. In this work, we propose a model based on a non-parametric regression method called Gaussian process (GP) to detect deviations from the made extrapolation assumptions. We introduce the theoretical background of this model and compare its performance to a parametric expansion of the adult model. The comparison includes simulations and a clinical study data example. The results show that the GP approach can reliably detect maturation trends from sparse pediatric data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2355-2372
Number of pages18
JournalSTATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume40
Issue number10
Early online date15 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 May 2021
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Gaussian processes
  • organ maturation
  • pharmacokinetic models

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Qualifying drug dosing regimens in pediatrics using Gaussian processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this