Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

Standard

Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography. / Hanke, Martin; Hyvönen, Nuutti; Reusswig, Stefanie.

In: SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2011, p. 1495-1497.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Hanke, Martin; Hyvönen, Nuutti; Reusswig, Stefanie / Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography.

In: SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2011, p. 1495-1497.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

Bibtex - Download

@article{e78181f30fc7421fb17c2976a4622c99,
title = "Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography",
keywords = "Backscatter, Electric impedance tomography, Uniqueness theorem",
author = "Martin Hanke and Nuutti Hyvönen and Stefanie Reusswig",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1137/110821780",
volume = "43",
pages = "1495--1497",
journal = "SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS",
issn = "0036-1410",
publisher = "Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications",
number = "3",

}

RIS - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography

AU - Hanke,Martin

AU - Hyvönen,Nuutti

AU - Reusswig,Stefanie

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur. © 2011 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

AB - We fix an incorrect statement from our paper [M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen, and S. Reusswig, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41 (2009), pp. 1948-1966] claiming that two different perfectly conducting inclusions necessarily have different backscatter in impedance tomography. We also present a counterexample to show that this kind of nonuniqueness does indeed occur. © 2011 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

KW - Backscatter

KW - Electric impedance tomography

KW - Uniqueness theorem

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960383934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1137/110821780

DO - 10.1137/110821780

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1495

EP - 1497

JO - SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS

T2 - SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS

JF - SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS

SN - 0036-1410

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 3227059