Abstract
Beyond merely mediating between particular interests, deliberative planners are in need of a firmer agency in shaping attention to common good concerns. However, locating such agency legitimately in the context of deliberative ideals is difficult, and not well supported by theory. A key problem is the weak conceptualization of legitimate forms of power-over, regarding the deliberative planners’ agency. To address this theoretical challenge, the article employs Haugaard’s rethinking of power-over, Salet’s dialectics of public norms and performative aspirations, the “systems” turn of deliberative democracy theory, and Warren’s related work on authority.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11-29 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Planning Theory and Practice |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 21 Feb 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- Common good
- communicative planning theory
- deliberative democracy theory
- power-over
- power-to
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public Planner – A Deliberative Authority'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
TRANAPLAN: TRANAPLAN
Mattila, H. (Principal investigator), Hytönen, J. (Project Member), Sorvoja, M. (Project Member), Airikkala, M. (Project Member), Hirvola, A. (Project Member) & Mård, P. (Principal investigator)
01/09/2020 → 31/08/2024
Project: RCF Academy Project
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver