Abstract
Purpose: Current cataract surgery guidelines recommend routine use of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in preventing pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema (PCME). Here, we compare the clinical efficacy and tolerability of two potent NSAIDs, nepafenac and preservative-free diclofenac following cataract surgery. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, prospective single-centre study. Ninety-six eyes of 95 patients undergoing routine cataract surgery were randomized 1:1 either to nepafenac (Nevanac, 1 mg/ml) or diclofenac (Dicloabak, 1 mg/ml) for 3 weeks. Seventy-three patients accounting for 73 eyes completed the entire follow-up. Aqueous flare and central retinal thickness (CRT) analysis were conducted preoperatively and at control visits 28 days and 3 months after surgery. A structured home questionnaire and interview were used to record any adverse effects of the topical medications, subjective visual recovery and the dispenser's ease of use. Results: No differences were observed between the groups for aqueous flare, CRT, speed of recovery or visual acuity gain. Seven patients (16%) on nepafenac and 20 patients (48%) on preservative-free diclofenac reported symptoms related to topical use of NSAID medications (p = 0.001). Conclusion: No differences in clinical efficacy were found between potent NSAIDs, while tolerability might be an issue.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 853-859 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Acta Ophthalmologica |
Volume | 96 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 1 Jan 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2018 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- cataract surgery
- efficacy
- nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
- pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema
- tolerability