Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

Christer Bengs*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

215 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020)
EditorsF Calabro, L DellaSpina
PublisherElsevier Science B.V.
Pages561-567
Number of pages7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
EventInternational Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives - Reggio Calabria, Italy
Duration: 18 May 201620 May 2016
Conference number: 2

Publication series

NameProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciences
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Volume223
ISSN (Print)1877-0428

Conference

ConferenceInternational Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives
Abbreviated titleISTH2020
CountryItaly
CityReggio Calabria
Period18/05/201620/05/2016

Keywords

  • Heritage
  • evaluation
  • expertise
  • NATIONAL CULTURE

Cite this