Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

Christer Bengs

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

269 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020)
Editors	F Calabro, L DellaSpina
Publisher	Elsevier
Pages	561-567
Number of pages	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344
Publication status	Published - 2016
MoE publication type	A4 Conference publication
Event	International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives - Reggio Calabria, Italy Duration: 18 May 2016 → 20 May 2016 Conference number: 2

Publication series

Name	Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher	ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Volume	223
ISSN (Print)	1877-0428

Conference

Conference	International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives
Abbreviated title	ISTH2020
Country/Territory	Italy
City	Reggio Calabria
Period	18/05/2016 → 20/05/2016

Keywords

Heritage
evaluation
expertise
NATIONAL CULTURE

Access to Document

10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

1-s2.0-S1877042816304244-main
2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Final published version, 211 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

Bengs, C. (2016). Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. In F. Calabro, & L. DellaSpina (Eds.), 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020) (pp. 561-567). (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 223). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

Bengs, Christer. / Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020). editor / F Calabro ; L DellaSpina. Elsevier, 2016. pp. 561-567 (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences).

@inproceedings{603bdb1edd59484d883440b9d9c59772,

title = "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate",

abstract = "International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.",

keywords = "Heritage, evaluation, expertise, NATIONAL CULTURE",

author = "Christer Bengs",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344",

language = "English",

series = "Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences",

publisher = "Elsevier",

pages = "561--567",

editor = "F Calabro and L DellaSpina",

booktitle = "2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020)",

address = "Netherlands",

note = "International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives, ISTH2020 ; Conference date: 18-05-2016 Through 20-05-2016",

}

Bengs, C 2016, Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. in F Calabro & L DellaSpina (eds), 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 223, Elsevier, pp. 561-567, International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives, Reggio Calabria, Italy, 18/05/2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. / Bengs, Christer.
2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020). ed. / F Calabro; L DellaSpina. Elsevier, 2016. p. 561-567 (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences; Vol. 223).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

AU - Bengs, Christer

N1 - Conference code: 2

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

AB - International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

KW - Heritage

KW - evaluation

KW - expertise

KW - NATIONAL CULTURE

U2 - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

DO - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

T3 - Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences

SP - 561

EP - 567

BT - 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020)

A2 - Calabro, F

A2 - DellaSpina, L

PB - Elsevier

T2 - International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives

Y2 - 18 May 2016 through 20 May 2016

ER -

Bengs C. Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. In Calabro F, DellaSpina L, editors, 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020). Elsevier. 2016. p. 561-567. (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences). doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this