pH regulation in frog cones studied by mass receptor photoresponses from the isolated retina

Ari Koskelainen, K. Donner, T. Lerber, S. Hemilä

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Mass cone photoresponses were recorded across the aspartate-treated frog retina under treatments chosen to affect putative pH-regulating mechanisms. The saturated response amplitude (Umax) was found to be a monotonically increasing function of perfusion pH in the range 7–8, and thus presumably of intracellular pH (pHi). Accepting that Umax can be used as an index of pH, changes, two results indicate the importance of bicarbonate transport for preventing intracellular acidification: (1) bicarbonate-buffered (6 mM HCO3− + 6 mM HEPES) perfusate increased Umax compared with nominally bicarbonate-free perfusate (12 mM HEPES); (2) the anion transport blocker DIDS (0.1 mM) caused a strong decrease in the amplitude of photoresponses. Substitution of 95 mM chloride by gluconate in the perfusing fluid boosted photoresponses indicating that at least part of the bicarbonate transport involves HCO3−/Cl− exchange. Amiloride (2mM) also caused a decrease of photoresponse amplitude, which suggests that Na+/H+ exchange contributes to pHi regulation. In all these respects, cones behaved similarly to rods. Cones differed from rods (in the intact retina) in that addition of 0.5 mM of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide reduced (never augmented) photoresponses. The difference is considered in relation to the presence of carbonic anhydrase in cone, as opposed to rod, outer segments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2181-2188
JournalVision Research
Volume33
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1993
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Cone photoreceptor
  • Retina
  • Phototransduction
  • pH regulation
  • ERG

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'pH regulation in frog cones studied by mass receptor photoresponses from the isolated retina'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this