On the reliability and validity of shipship collision risk analysis in light of different perspectives on risk

Floris Goerlandt; Pentti Kujala

On the reliability and validity of shipship collision risk analysis in light of different perspectives on risk

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

148 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	348-365
Journal	Safety Science
Issue number	62
Publication status	Published - 2014
MoE publication type	A1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

Quantitative risk analysis
Reliability
Risk perspective
Shipship collision
Validity

Cite this

@article{8a53c9f847e14c1ab1fcfb9f91c352cb,

title = "On the reliability and validity of shipship collision risk analysis in light of different perspectives on risk",

keywords = "Quantitative risk analysis, Reliability, Risk perspective, Shipship collision, Validity, Quantitative risk analysis, Reliability, Risk perspective, Shipship collision, Validity, Quantitative risk analysis, Reliability, Risk perspective, Shipship collision, Validity",

author = "Floris Goerlandt and Pentti Kujala",

note = "VK: T20404",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

pages = "348--365",

journal = "Safety Science",

issn = "0925-7535",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "62",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the reliability and validity of shipship collision risk analysis in light of different perspectives on risk

AU - Goerlandt, Floris

AU - Kujala, Pentti

N1 - VK: T20404

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

KW - Quantitative risk analysis

KW - Reliability

KW - Risk perspective

KW - Shipship collision

KW - Validity

KW - Quantitative risk analysis

KW - Reliability

KW - Risk perspective

KW - Shipship collision

KW - Validity

KW - Quantitative risk analysis

KW - Reliability

KW - Risk perspective

KW - Shipship collision

KW - Validity

M3 - Article

SN - 0925-7535

SP - 348

EP - 365

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

IS - 62

ER -