Abstract
With an application on the UK, this paper shows that myopic planning might result in delayed strategic investments and in considerably higher costs for achieving decarbonisation targets compared to estimates done with perfect foresight optimisation energy models. It also suggests that carbon prices obtained from perfect foresight energy models might be under-estimated. The study was performed using a combination of the standard UK Times Model (UKTM), a perfect foresight, bottom-up, technology-rich cost optimisation energy model, and its myopic foresight version: My-UKTM. This also demonstrates that using perfect foresight optimisation models in tandem with their myopic equivalents can provide valuable indications for policy design.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 19-26 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Energy Strategy Reviews |
Volume | 17 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- Energy systems decarbonisation
- Myopic models
- Optimisation energy models
- Perfect foresight
- Technology diffusion
- TIMES model
- United Kingdom