Abstract
The global energy system has a long way to go to meet international climate goals, and significant investment in renewable energy is required to accelerate the energy transition (IRENA, 2016, 2019). We examine how firm- and country-specific conditions in the electric utility sector impact foreign direct investment (FDI) in renewables. Using a unique dataset of 289 greenfield investments by 17 multinational energy utilities, we employ a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) that yields five causal configurations leading to FDI in renewables and four configurations leading to investment in non-renewables. Our results indicate that private MNEs are at the forefront of investment in renewables, and while state-owned MNEs (SOMNEs) do invest in them, they tend to follow strategies that are less risky compared to private MNEs and more responsive to host-country incentives. Our analysis suggests that for private MNEs, international experience is strongly associated with investment in renewables, while for SOMNEs it is associated with investment in non-renewables. Further, we also identify instances where MNEs contribute simultaneously to a ‘race to the top’ and a ‘race to the bottom’ by investing in both renewables and non-renewables in different markets, thereby reducing the pace of the energy transition.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 930-950 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of International Business Studies |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 8 Jan 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2021 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- energy transition
- pollution havens
- FSA-CSA matrix
- FDI
- incentives
- state-owned enterprises