Modern living in a forest - landscape architecture of Finnish forest suburbs in the 1940s-1960s.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The article examines Finnish forest suburbs in the 1940s–1960s. We highlight the role of landscape architecture–a dimension that has received limited attention. Suburban landscapes have largely remained as an invisible background of modern architecture without design history of their own. Our article focuses on forest landscapes and discusses how they were conceptualized and implemented by urban and landscape planners. With the case studies of Tapiola and Vuosaari, we demonstrate that forests were not neutral and ‘natural’, but culturally constructed and carefully designed. We look at the construction of nature in landscape architecture and show how suburban forests were amenitized by recreation facilities and embedded with moral and restorative aspirations. In both cases, nature was the starting point; however, the design approaches evince clear differences. In Tapiola, the aim was the aestheticization of the forest–enhancing nature with design interventions–whereas in Vuosaari, the focus was on the natural state. Forests were regarded as a specifically Finnish landscape, which rooted rural migrants to their new home. The national dimension was also manifested by using native biotopes and tree species. Finnishness was consciously constructed, and modern living in the forest became the national and international icon of urban planning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalGEOGRAFISKA ANNALER SERIES B: HUMAN GEOGRAPHY
Early online date16 Oct 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Oct 2021
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • forest suburbs, landscape architecture, post-war urban planning, suburban forests

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modern living in a forest - landscape architecture of Finnish forest suburbs in the 1940s-1960s.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this