Modeling movable objects improves localization in dynamic environments

Matti Pekkanen*, Francesco Verdoja, Ville Kyrki

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsProfessional

Abstract

Most state-of-the-art robotic maps assume a static world; therefore, dynamic objects are filtered out of the measurements. However, this division ignores movable but non-moving, i.e., semi-static objects, which are usually recorded in the map and treated as static objects, violating the static world assumption and causing errors in the localization. This paper presents a method for modeling moving and movable objects to match the map and measurements consistently. This reduces the error resulting from inconsistent categorization and treatment of non-static measurements. A semantic segmentation network is used to categorize the measurements into static and semi-static classes, and a background subtraction-based filtering method is used to remove dynamic measurements. Experimental comparison against a state-of-the-art baseline solution using real-world data from the Oxford Radar RobotCar data set shows that consistent assumptions over dynamics increase localization accuracy.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWorkshop on Future of Construction: Lifelong Learning Robots in Changing Construction Sites
PublisherIEEE
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 13 May 2024
MoE publication typeD3 Professional conference proceedings
EventWorkshop on Future of Construction: Lifelong Learning Robots in Changing Construction Sites - Pacifico Yokohama, Yokohama, Japan
Duration: 13 May 202413 May 2024
Conference number: 3
https://construction-robots.github.io/

Workshop

WorkshopWorkshop on Future of Construction
Country/TerritoryJapan
CityYokohama
Period13/05/202413/05/2024
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling movable objects improves localization in dynamic environments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this